From Language to Language-ish: How Brain-Like is an LSTM's Representation of Nonsensical Language Stimuli?

The representations generated by many models of language (word embeddings, recurrent neural networks and transformers) correlate to brain activity recorded while people read. However, these decoding results are usually based on the brain's reaction to syntactically and semantically sound language stimuli. In this study, we asked: how does an LSTM (long short term memory) language model, trained (by and large) on semantically and syntactically intact language, represent a language sample with degraded semantic or syntactic information? Does the LSTM representation still resemble the brain's reaction? We found that, even for some kinds of nonsensical language, there is a statistically significant relationship between the brain's activity and the representations of an LSTM. This indicates that, at least in some instances, LSTMs and the human brain handle nonsensical data similarly.

Beyond Prioritized Replay: Sampling States in Model-Based RL via Simulated Priorities

Model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) can significantly improve sample efficiency, particularly when carefully choosing the states from which to sample hypothetical transitions. Such prioritization has been empirically shown to be useful for both experience replay (ER) and Dyna-style planning. However, there is as yet little theoretical understanding in RL about such prioritization strategies, and why they help. In this work, we revisit prioritized ER and, in an ideal setting, show an equivalence to minimizing cubic loss, providing theoretical insight into why it improves upon uniform sampling. This ideal setting, however, cannot be realized in practice, due to insufficient coverage of the sample space and outdated priorities of training samples. This motivates our model-based approach, which does not suffer from these limitations. Our key idea is to actively search for high priority states using gradient ascent. Under certain conditions, we prove that the distribution of hypothetical experiences generated from these states provides a diverse set of states, sampled proportionally to approximately true priorities. Our experiments on both benchmark and application-oriented domain show that our approach achieves superior performance over both the model-free prioritized ER method and several closely related model-based baselines.

Towards a practical measure of interference for reinforcement learning

Catastrophic interference is common in many network-based learning systems, and many proposals exist for mitigating it. But, before we overcome interference we must understand it better. In this work, we provide a definition of interference for control in reinforcement learning. We systematically evaluate our new measures, by assessing correlation with several measures of learning performance, including stability, sample efficiency, and online and offline control performance across a variety of learning architectures. Our new interference measure allows us to ask novel scientific questions about commonly used deep learning architectures. In particular we show that target network frequency is a dominating factor for interference, and that updates on the last layer result in significantly higher interference than updates internal to the network. This new measure can be expensive to compute; we conclude with motivation for an efficient proxy measure and empirically demonstrate it is correlated with our definition of interference.

Gradient Temporal-Difference Learning with Regularized Corrections

It is still common to use Q-learning and temporal difference (TD) learning-even though they have divergence issues and sound Gradient TD alternatives exist-because divergence seems rare and they typically perform well. However, recent work with large neural network learning systems reveals that instability is more common than previously thought. Practitioners face a difficult dilemma: choose an easy to use and performant TD method, or a more complex algorithm that is more sound but harder to tune and all but unexplored with non-linear function approximation or control. In this paper, we introduce a new method called TD with Regularized Corrections (TDRC), that attempts to balance ease of use, soundness, and performance. It behaves as well as TD, when TD performs well, but is sound in cases where TD diverges. We empirically investigate TDRC across a range of problems, for both prediction and control, and for both linear and non-linear function approximation, and show, potentially for the first time, that gradient TD methods could be a better alternative to TD and Q-learning.

Selective Dyna-style Planning Under Limited Model Capacity

In model-based reinforcement learning, planning with an imperfect model of the environment has the potential to harm learning progress. But even when a model is imperfect, it may still contain information that is useful for planning. In this paper, we investigate the idea of using an imperfect model selectively. The agent should plan in parts of the state space where the model would be helpful but refrain from using the model where it would be harmful. An effective selective planning mechanism requires estimating predictive uncertainty, which arises out of aleatoric uncertainty, parameter uncertainty, and model inadequacy, among other sources. Prior work has focused on parameter uncertainty for selective planning. In this work, we emphasize the importance of model inadequacy. We show that heteroscedastic regression can signal predictive uncertainty arising from model inadequacy that is complementary to that which is detected by methods designed for parameter uncertainty, indicating that considering both parameter uncertainty and model inadequacy may be a more promising direction for effective selective planning than either in isolation.

Learning Causal Models Online

Predictive models -- learned from observational data not covering the complete data distribution -- can rely on spurious correlations in the data for making predictions. These correlations make the models brittle and hinder generalization. One solution for achieving strong generalization is to incorporate causal structures in the models; such structures constrain learning by ignoring correlations that contradict them. However, learning these structures is a hard problem in itself. Moreover, it's not clear how to incorporate the machinery of causality with online continual learning. In this work, we take an indirect approach to discovering causal models. Instead of searching for the true causal model directly, we propose an online algorithm that continually detects and removes spurious features. Our algorithm works on the idea that the correlation of a spurious feature with a target is not constant over-time. As a result, the weight associated with that feature is constantly changing. We show that by continually removing such features, our method converges to solutions that have strong generalization. Moreover, our method combined with random search can also discover non-spurious features from raw sensory data. Finally, our work highlights that the information present in the temporal structure of the problem -- destroyed by shuffling the data -- is essential for detecting spurious features online.

Hallucinating Value: A Pitfall of Dyna-style Planning with Imperfect Environment Models

Dyna-style reinforcement learning (RL) agents improve sample efficiency over model-free RL agents by updating the value function with simulated experience generated by an environment model. However, it is often difficult to learn accurate models of environment dynamics, and even small errors may result in failure of Dyna agents. In this paper, we investigate one type of model error: hallucinated states. These are states generated by the model, but that are not real states of the environment. We present the Hallucinated Value Hypothesis (HVH): updating values of real states towards values of hallucinated states results in misleading state-action values which adversely affect the control policy. We discuss and evaluate four Dyna variants; three which update real states toward simulated -- and therefore potentially hallucinated -- states and one which does not. The experimental results provide evidence for the HVH thus suggesting a fruitful direction toward developing Dyna algorithms robust to model error.

Optimizing for the Future in Non-Stationary MDPs

Most reinforcement learning methods are based upon the key assumption that the transition dynamics and reward functions are fixed, that is, the underlying Markov decision process (MDP) is stationary. However, in many practical real-world applications, this assumption is often violated. We discuss how current methods can have inherent limitations for non-stationary MDPs, and therefore searching for a policy that is good for the future, unknown MDP, requires rethinking the optimization paradigm. To address this problem, we develop a method that builds upon ideas from both counter-factual reasoning and curve-fitting to proactively search for a good future policy, without ever modeling the underlying non-stationarity. Interestingly, we observe that minimizing performance over some of the data from past episodes might be beneficial when searching for a policy that maximizes future performance. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on problems motivated by real-world applications.