Novelty-Driven Binary Particle Swarm Optimisation for Truss Optimisation Problems

Topology optimisation of trusses can be formulated as a combinatorial and multi-modal problem in which locating distinct optimal designs allows practitioners to choose the best design based on their preferences. Bilevel optimisation has been successfully applied to truss optimisation to consider topology and sizing in upper and lower levels, respectively. We introduce exact enumeration to rigorously analyse the topology search space and remove randomness for small problems. We also propose novelty-driven binary particle swarm optimisation for bigger problems to discover new designs at the upper level by maximising novelty. For the lower level, we employ a reliable evolutionary optimiser to tackle the layout configuration aspect of the problem. We consider truss optimisation problem instances where designers need to select the size of bars from a discrete set with respect to practice code constraints. Our experimental investigations show that our approach outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods and it obtains multiple high-quality solutions.

Efficiently solving the thief orienteering problem with a max-min ant colony optimization approach

We tackle the Thief Orienteering Problem (ThOP), which is academic multi-component problem: it combines two classical combinatorial problems, namely the Knapsack Problem (KP) and the Orienteering Problem (OP). In this problem, a thief has a time limit to steal items that distributed in a given set of cities. While traveling, the thief collects items by storing them in their knapsack, which in turn reduces the travel speed. The thief has as the objective to maximize the total profit of the stolen items. In this article, we present an approach that combines swarm-intelligence with a randomized packing heuristic. Our solution approach outperforms existing works on almost all the 432 benchmarking instances, with significant improvements.

Generating Instances with Performance Differences for More Than Just Two Algorithms

In recent years, Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) have frequently been adopted to evolve instances for optimization problems that pose difficulties for one algorithm while being rather easy for a competitor and vice versa. Typically, this is achieved by either minimizing or maximizing the performance difference or ratio which serves as the fitness function. Repeating this process is useful to gain insights into strengths/weaknesses of certain algorithms or to build a set of instances with strong performance differences as a foundation for automatic per-instance algorithm selection or configuration. We contribute to this branch of research by proposing fitness-functions to evolve instances that show large performance differences for more than just two algorithms simultaneously. As a proof-of-principle, we evolve instances of the multi-component Traveling Thief Problem~(TTP) for three incomplete TTP-solvers. Our results point out that our strategies are promising, but unsurprisingly their success strongly relies on the algorithms' performance complementarity.

Metaheuristics "In the Large"

Following decades of sustained improvement, metaheuristics are one of the great success stories of optimization research. However, in order for research in metaheuristics to avoid fragmentation and a lack of reproducibility, there is a pressing need for stronger scientific and computational infrastructure to support the development, analysis and comparison of new approaches. We argue that, via principled choice of infrastructure support, the field can pursue a higher level of scientific enquiry. We describe our vision and report on progress, showing how the adoption of common protocols for all metaheuristics can help liberate the potential of the field, easing the exploration of the design space of metaheuristics.

Towards Metaheuristics "In the Large"

Following decades of sustained improvement, metaheuristics are one of the great success stories of optimization research. However, in order for research in metaheuristics to avoid fragmentation and a lack of reproducibility, there is a pressing need for stronger scientific and computational infrastructure to support the development, analysis and comparison of new approaches. We argue that, via principled choice of infrastructure support, the field can pursue a higher level of scientific enquiry. We describe our vision and report on progress, showing how the adoption of common protocols for all metaheuristics can help liberate the potential of the field, easing the exploration of the design space of metaheuristics.

A weighted-sum method for solving the bi-objective traveling thief problem

Many real-world optimization problems have multiple interacting components. Each of these can be NP-hard and they can be in conflict with each other, i.e., the optimal solution for one component does not necessarily represent an optimal solution for the other components. This can be a challenge for single-objective formulations, where the respective influence that each component has on the overall solution quality can vary from instance to instance. In this paper, we study a bi-objective formulation of the traveling thief problem, which has as components the traveling salesperson problem and the knapsack problem. We present a weighted-sum method that makes use of randomized versions of existing heuristics, and that would have won two recent optimization competitions.

GTOPX Space Mission Benchmarks

This contribution introduces the GTOPX space mission benchmark collection, which is an extension of GTOP database published by the European Space Agency (ESA). GTOPX consists of ten individual benchmark instances representing real-world interplanetary space trajectory design problems. In regard to the original GTOP collection, GTOPX includes three new problem instances featuring mixed-integer and multi-objective properties. GTOPX enables a simplified user handling, unified benchmark function call and some minor bug corrections to the original GTOP implementation. Furthermore, GTOPX is linked from it's original C++ source code to Python and Matlab based on dynamic link libraries, assuring computationally fast and accurate reproduction of the benchmark results in all three programming languages. Space mission trajectory design problems as those represented in GTOPX are known to be highly non-linear and difficult to solve. The GTOPX collection, therefore, aims particularly at researchers wishing to put advanced (meta)heuristic and hybrid optimization algorithms to the test. The goal of this paper is to provide researchers with a manual and reference to the newly available GTOPX benchmark software.

Genetic Improvement @ ICSE 2020

Following Prof. Mark Harman of Facebook's keynote and formal presentations (which are recorded in the proceedings) there was a wide ranging discussion at the eighth international Genetic Improvement workshop, GI-2020 @ ICSE (held as part of the 42nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering on Friday 3rd July 2020). Topics included industry take up, human factors, explainabiloity (explainability, justifyability, exploitability) and GI benchmarks. We also contrast various recent online approaches (e.g. SBST 2020) to holding virtual computer science conferences and workshops via the WWW on the Internet without face-2-face interaction. Finally we speculate on how the Coronavirus Covid-19 Pandemic will affect research next year and into the future.

Benchmarking in Optimization: Best Practice and Open Issues

This survey compiles ideas and recommendations from more than a dozen researchers with different backgrounds and from different institutes around the world. Promoting best practice in benchmarking is its main goal. The article discusses eight essential topics in benchmarking: clearly stated goals, well-specified problems, suitable algorithms, adequate performance measures, thoughtful analysis, effective and efficient designs, comprehensible presentations, and guaranteed reproducibility. The final goal is to provide well-accepted guidelines (rules) that might be useful for authors and reviewers. As benchmarking in optimization is an active and evolving field of research this manuscript is meant to co-evolve over time by means of periodic updates.