LLM Factoscope: Uncovering LLMs' Factual Discernment through Inner States Analysis

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various domains with extensive knowledge and creative capabilities. However, a critical issue with LLMs is their tendency to produce outputs that diverge from factual reality. This phenomenon is particularly concerning in sensitive applications such as medical consultation and legal advice, where accuracy is paramount. In this paper, we introduce the LLM factoscope, a novel Siamese network-based model that leverages the inner states of LLMs for factual detection. Our investigation reveals distinguishable patterns in LLMs' inner states when generating factual versus non-factual content. We demonstrate the LLM factoscope's effectiveness across various architectures, achieving over 96% accuracy in factual detection. Our work opens a new avenue for utilizing LLMs' inner states for factual detection and encourages further exploration into LLMs' inner workings for enhanced reliability and transparency.

Good-looking but Lacking Faithfulness: Understanding Local Explanation Methods through Trend-based Testing

While enjoying the great achievements brought by deep learning (DL), people are also worried about the decision made by DL models, since the high degree of non-linearity of DL models makes the decision extremely difficult to understand. Consequently, attacks such as adversarial attacks are easy to carry out, but difficult to detect and explain, which has led to a boom in the research on local explanation methods for explaining model decisions. In this paper, we evaluate the faithfulness of explanation methods and find that traditional tests on faithfulness encounter the random dominance problem, \ie, the random selection performs the best, especially for complex data. To further solve this problem, we propose three trend-based faithfulness tests and empirically demonstrate that the new trend tests can better assess faithfulness than traditional tests on image, natural language and security tasks. We implement the assessment system and evaluate ten popular explanation methods. Benefiting from the trend tests, we successfully assess the explanation methods on complex data for the first time, bringing unprecedented discoveries and inspiring future research. Downstream tasks also greatly benefit from the tests. For example, model debugging equipped with faithful explanation methods performs much better for detecting and correcting accuracy and security problems.

DeepObliviate: A Powerful Charm for Erasing Data Residual Memory in Deep Neural Networks

Machine unlearning has great significance in guaranteeing model security and protecting user privacy. Additionally, many legal provisions clearly stipulate that users have the right to demand model providers to delete their own data from training set, that is, the right to be forgotten. The naive way of unlearning data is to retrain the model without it from scratch, which becomes extremely time and resource consuming at the modern scale of deep neural networks. Other unlearning approaches by refactoring model or training data struggle to gain a balance between overhead and model usability. In this paper, we propose an approach, dubbed as DeepObliviate, to implement machine unlearning efficiently, without modifying the normal training mode. Our approach improves the original training process by storing intermediate models on the hard disk. Given a data point to unlearn, we first quantify its temporal residual memory left in stored models. The influenced models will be retrained and we decide when to terminate the retraining based on the trend of residual memory on-the-fly. Last, we stitch an unlearned model by combining the retrained models and uninfluenced models. We extensively evaluate our approach on five datasets and deep learning models. Compared to the method of retraining from scratch, our approach can achieve 99.0%, 95.0%, 91.9%, 96.7%, 74.1% accuracy rates and 66.7$\times$, 75.0$\times$, 33.3$\times$, 29.4$\times$, 13.7$\times$ speedups on the MNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10, Purchase, and ImageNet datasets, respectively. Compared to the state-of-the-art unlearning approach, we improve 5.8% accuracy, 32.5$\times$ prediction speedup, and reach a comparable retrain speedup under identical settings on average on these datasets. Additionally, DeepObliviate can also pass the backdoor-based unlearning verification.

Towards Privacy and Security of Deep Learning Systems: A Survey

Deep learning has gained tremendous success and great popularity in the past few years. However, recent research found that it is suffering several inherent weaknesses, which can threaten the security and privacy of the stackholders. Deep learning's wide use further magnifies the caused consequences. To this end, lots of research has been conducted with the purpose of exhaustively identifying intrinsic weaknesses and subsequently proposing feasible mitigation. Yet few is clear about how these weaknesses are incurred and how effective are these attack approaches in assaulting deep learning. In order to unveil the security weaknesses and aid in the development of a robust deep learning system, we are devoted to undertaking a comprehensive investigation on attacks towards deep learning, and extensively evaluating these attacks in multiple views. In particular, we focus on four types of attacks associated with security and privacy of deep learning: model extraction attack, model inversion attack, poisoning attack and adversarial attack. For each type of attack, we construct its essential workflow as well as adversary capabilities and attack goals. Many pivot metrics are devised for evaluating the attack approaches, by which we perform a quantitative and qualitative analysis. From the analysis, we have identified significant and indispensable factors in an attack vector, \eg, how to reduce queries to target models, what distance used for measuring perturbation. We spot light on 17 findings covering these approaches' merits and demerits, success probability, deployment complexity and prospects. Moreover, we discuss other potential security weaknesses and possible mitigation which can inspire relevant researchers in this area.