GSA-YOLO: A High-Efficiency Framework via Structured Sparsity and Adaptive Knowledge Distillation for Real-Time X-ray Security Inspection

X-ray security inspection requires accurate real-time detection of prohibited items, but existing models often struggle to balance the challenges of severe occlusion, complex clutter, and strict speed requirements. To overcome these challenges, this paper proposes GSA-YOLO, a novel lightweight framework built upon the YOLOv8n architecture, specifically engineered to enhance detection robustness and inference efficiency. GSA-YOLO strategically integrates structured sparsity and adaptive knowledge transfer through three core components: Group Lasso (GL) applied to the network neck for robust feature extraction; Sparse Structure Selection (SSS) applied to the detection head for significant model slimming; and an Adaptive Knowledge Distillation (Ada-KD) mechanism for comprehensive accuracy recovery. This integrated approach synergistically enhances feature representation while pruning redundant channels, maximizing model efficiency without sacrificing performance. Rigorous evaluations on the HiXray and PIDray datasets confirm GSA-YOLO's comprehensive capability, achieving a leading inference speed of 189.62 FPS, accompanied by a reduction in computational cost from 8.7G to 8.0G. Crucially, GSA-YOLO secures mAP50:95 results of 0.531 and 0.679 on HiXray and PIDray, demonstrating 2.4% and 1.8% improvements over the baseline, respectively. Compared to other models, GSA-YOLO exhibits enhanced accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency, making it a promising solution for practical X-ray security inspection.

CiteVQA: Benchmarking Evidence Attribution for Trustworthy Document Intelligence

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly advanced document understanding, yet current Doc-VQA evaluations score only the final answer and leave the supporting evidence unchecked. This answer-only approach masks a critical failure mode: a model can land on the correct answer while grounding it in the wrong passage -- a critical risk in high-stakes domains like law, finance, and medicine, where every conclusion must be traceable to a specific source region. To address this, we introduce CiteVQA, a benchmark that requires models to return element-level bounding-box citations alongside each answer, evaluating both jointly. CiteVQA comprises 1,897 questions across 711 PDFs spanning seven domains and two languages, averaging 40.6 pages per document. To ensure fidelity and scalability, the ground-truth citations are generated by an automated pipeline-which identifies crucial evidence via masking ablation-and are subsequently validated through expert review. At the core of our evaluation is Strict Attributed Accuracy (SAA), which credits a prediction only when the answer and the cited region are both correct. Auditing 20 MLLMs reveals a pervasive Attribution Hallucination: models frequently produce the right answer while citing the wrong region. The strongest system (Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview) achieves an SAA of only 76.0, and the strongest open-source MLLM reaches just 22.5. Ultimately, towards trustworthy document intelligence, CiteVQA exposes a reliability gap that answer-only evaluations overlook, providing the instrumentation needed to close it. Our repository is available at https://github.com/opendatalab/CiteVQA.