SciFigQual-Bench: A Benchmark for Scientific Figure Quality Assessment with Full-Manuscript Context

Scientific images are the core elements of presenting experimental conclusions, elaborating system architecture, and supporting comparative arguments in scientific papers. However, existing image quality assessment (IQA) methods are predominantly designed for natural photographs or AI-generated content, which cannot be directly applied to scientific papers. The few existing studies on scholarly charts remain confined to visual-surface comparisons, failing to verify caption alignment, citation relevance, or visual misleadingness. To address this, we propose SciFigQual-Bench, a full-text contextual benchmark that evaluates scientific images across five dimensions (clarity, layout, caption fit, context relevance, and misleading risk). The data covers top computer-science conferences from 2020 to 2025; 6,308 images were independently scored by multiple domain experts in five dimensions and aggregated into gold-standard annotations. Unlike previous scientific figure benchmarks, our dataset binds each image to its caption, citing sentence, and manuscript context. To enable automated evaluation on this benchmark, we designed a staged cross-modal evaluation framework SFQ-Agent to achieve auditable and refined scoring through the collection and fusion of modal evidence. Multiple mainstream large models were evaluated on the test subset eval1200, and SFQ-Agent (F3) equipped with GPT-5.6-Sol achieved the lowest overall average absolute error (0.418) and the highest consistency rate (93.4%), consistently outperforming both direct evaluation and auxiliary (Sidecar) visual language model evaluation schemes.

SciFigAlign: Scoring Scientific Figures by Fine-tuned Alignment of Visuals with Manuscript Evidence

Scientific figure assessment in peer review differs fundamentally from general image quality evaluation: a figure must be visually legible, faithfully support the manuscript's claims, and communicate evidence with a clear visual hierarchy. However, if we apply traditional image assessment methods to scientific figure quality assessment, limitations emerge: classic IQA models capture perceptual quality or aesthetics but cannot judge whether a figure serves the paper's scientific argument; CLIP-based methods assess generic image-text correspondence, yet lack understanding of manuscript context; and zero-shot LLM/VLM judges, when repurposed for figure scoring, often yield overly concentrated scores with limited fusion of visual and textual evidence. We introduce an annotated dataset of 3,857 scientific figures from peer-reviewed conference papers, each rated along four peer-review-oriented dimensions: Clarity, Relevance, Informativeness, and Structure. We propose SciFigAlign, a fine-tuned multimodal scorer that grounds figure quality assessment in manuscript evidence. Given a figure crop, caption, citing paragraphs, and light paper context, SciFigAlign fine-tunes CLIP and SciBERT end-to-end with per-modality cross-attention and CubeMLP fusion, jointly optimizing SmoothL1 regression with a within-paper ranking hinge loss. Under paper-level splits, SciFigAlign achieves a macro MAE of 0.3524 and a within-paper pairwise accuracy of 81.64% on the test set with n = 396, a 59% relative error reduction over the best LLM-as-judge baseline with MAE 0.864. Ablations confirm that manuscript-grounded inputs, citing-context denoising, and ranking supervision are all critical, showing that scientific figure assessment requires learned alignment between visual content and manuscript evidence rather than prompting alone, even with state-of-the-art VLMs.

DrawVideo: Generating Long Video from Storyboard Keyframe Sketches

Long video generation requires high-fidelity synthesis, coherent narrative structure, and user control over extended time spans. Existing text-to-video methods often rely on a single long prompt, limiting control over pose, composition, layout, and motion. We propose DrawVideo, a sketch-guided, storyboard-driven framework for controllable long-video generation. DrawVideo decomposes long videos into independently controllable shots, each defined by a black-and-white sketch, an appearance prompt, and a motion prompt. The sketch controls pose and layout, the appearance prompt defines identity, scene, and style, and the motion prompt guides temporal dynamics. DrawVideo follows a hierarchical 'global multi-shot, local single-sketch' strategy: it first generates a structure-aligned reference keyframe, then expands the motion prompt into derivative keyframes representing action states, and finally synthesizes clips between adjacent keyframes to build each shot. We also introduce SketchLongVideo, the first dataset for sketch-guided text-to-long-video generation, constructed from animation videos via shot detection, keyframe extraction, vision-language recognition, prompt decomposition, and sketch conversion. Experiments show that DrawVideo achieves strong structural controllability, appearance consistency, visual stability, and coherent long-video generation.

CrossWeaver: Cross-modal Weaving for Arbitrary-Modality Semantic Segmentation

Multimodal semantic segmentation has shown great potential in leveraging complementary information across diverse sensing modalities. However, existing approaches often rely on carefully designed fusion strategies that either use modality-specific adaptations or rely on loosely coupled interactions, thereby limiting flexibility and resulting in less effective cross-modal coordination. Moreover, these methods often struggle to balance efficient information exchange with preserving the unique characteristics of each modality across different modality combinations. To address these challenges, we propose CrossWeaver, a simple yet effective multimodal fusion framework for arbitrary-modality semantic segmentation. Its core is a Modality Interaction Block (MIB), which enables selective and reliability-aware cross-modal interaction within the encoder, while a lightweight Seam-Aligned Fusion (SAF) module further aggregates the enhanced features. Extensive experiments on multiple multimodal semantic segmentation benchmarks demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance with minimal additional parameters and strong generalization to unseen modality combinations.

RxnBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Chemical Reaction Understanding from Scientific Literature

The integration of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) into chemistry promises to revolutionize scientific discovery, yet their ability to comprehend the dense, graphical language of reactions within authentic literature remains underexplored. Here, we introduce RxnBench, a multi-tiered benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate MLLMs on chemical reaction understanding from scientific PDFs. RxnBench comprises two tasks: Single-Figure QA (SF-QA), which tests fine-grained visual perception and mechanistic reasoning using 1,525 questions derived from 305 curated reaction schemes, and Full-Document QA (FD-QA), which challenges models to synthesize information from 108 articles, requiring cross-modal integration of text, schemes, and tables. Our evaluation of MLLMs reveals a critical capability gap: while models excel at extracting explicit text, they struggle with deep chemical logic and precise structural recognition. Notably, models with inference-time reasoning significantly outperform standard architectures, yet none achieve 50\% accuracy on FD-QA. These findings underscore the urgent need for domain-specific visual encoders and stronger reasoning engines to advance autonomous AI chemists.