Abstract:Process reward models (PRMs) enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by providing fine-grained feedback, yet training PRMs typically requires expensive stepwise annotations. Outcome-supervised PRMs offer a scalable alternative by learning from final-answer correctness alone, but this introduces a fundamental *credit assignment* challenge, i.e., attributing outcomes to responsible reasoning steps. Existing approaches rely on either uniform or causal assignment, both of which fail to anchor credit in step correctness and thus hinder process error identification. In this work, we propose Outcome-Supervised Process Reward Modeling via **L**earnable **C**redit **A**ssignment (**LCA**), an outcome-supervised PRM framework that jointly learns credit assignment and reward modeling under the principle of *Weakest Link Assignment: a reasoning chain is as strong as its weakest link*. To address mutual dependence between credit assignment and reward modeling, we formalize outcome-supervised PRM as a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) problem and introduce Softmax-Weighted-Sum (SWS) pooling, an MIL pooling technique tailored for strong dependence and redundancy among reasoning states. We prove Bayes consistency of our algorithm under mild assumptions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that **LCA** consistently outperforms state-of-the-art outcome-supervised PRMs across multiple tasks and backbones. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LCA.
Abstract:Rubric-based rewards offer interpretable and fine-grained optimization signals for reinforcement learning in open-ended tasks where verifiable answers are unavailable. However, pre-constructed rubrics remain static throughout training, creating a fundamental mismatch with the evolving policy: fixed criteria gradually lose discriminative power as the model improves, leading to reward saturation and potential hacking. Recent dynamic rubric methods partially address this but rely on external frontier models or ground-truth answers, and update rubrics only at coarse granularity. We propose EvoRubrics, a co-evolutionary RL framework where a Policy LLM and a Rubric Generator jointly improve through adversarial interaction within each training step. As the policy improves under the rubric generator's guidance, the rubric generator adapts its criteria to remain discriminative and informative, enabling evaluation to track the policy in real time and naturally inducing an automatic curriculum. Experiments show that EvoRubrics consistently outperforms static and dynamic rubric baselines across benchmarks. The learned Rubric Generator further generalizes as a transferable reward model. Notably, even a fully self-supervised variant without any external supervision achieves meaningful gains, suggesting that co-evolution between generation and evaluation alone can provide sufficiently rich learning signals. Our code is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/EvoRubrics-2155/.
Abstract:Recent work has sought to understand Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning, yet a principled, model-intrinsic signal that captures its layer-wise reasoning dynamics remains underexplored. We bridge this gap by demonstrating that the l2 norm of hidden states serves as an endogenous signal of the model's reasoning intensity. Using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) as a diagnostic probe, we observe that LLMs' internal reasoning is marked by a sharp increase in reasoning feature activations concentrated in late layers. Motivated by this pattern, we establish a formal link between reasoning intensity and the model's latent geometry and theoretically prove that the l2 norm of hidden states bounds the activation strength of SAE reasoning features. Empirical correlation analysis and causal interventions further validate the l2 norm as a faithful indicator, where heightened norms consistently correspond to critical reasoning steps. We then introduce three test-time scaling techniques guided by l2 norms: (i) Adaptive Layer-wise Reasoning Recursion, (ii) Endogenous Reasoning State Steering, and (iii) l2-guided Response Selection, which requires no additional training or data and is compatible with advanced inference engines. Experiments across model architectures and benchmarks show that l2-norm-based techniques significantly improve reasoning performance, offering a principled yet simple lens to perceive and control LLM latent reasoning dynamics. Our code is available at https://github.com/zjy1298/The-Tell-Tale-Norm.
Abstract:Clinical Reasoning on Electronic Health Records (EHRs) is a fundamental yet challenging task in modern healthcare. While in-context learning (ICL) offers a promising inference-time adaptation paradigm for large language models (LLMs) in EHR reasoning, existing methods face three fundamental challenges: (1) Perspective Limitation, where data-driven similarity fails to align with LLM reasoning needs and model-driven signals are constrained by limited clinical competence; (2) Cohort Awareness, as demonstrations are selected independently without modeling population-level structure; and (3) Information Aggregation, where redundancy and interaction effects among demonstrations are ignored, leading to diminishing marginal gains. To address these challenges, we propose GraphWalker, a principled demonstration selection framework for EHR-oriented ICL. GraphWalker (i) jointly models patient clinical information and LLM-estimated information gain by integrating data-driven and model-driven perspectives, (ii) incorporates Cohort Discovery to avoid noisy local optima, and (iii) employs a Lazy Greedy Search with Frontier Expansion algorithm to mitigate diminishing marginal returns in information aggregation. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world EHR benchmarks demonstrate that GraphWalker consistently outperforms state-of-the-art ICL baselines, yielding substantial improvements in clinical reasoning performance. Our code is open-sourced at https://github.com/PuppyKnightUniversity/GraphWalker




Abstract:Large Language Models(LLMs) excel in general tasks but struggle in specialized domains like healthcare due to limited domain-specific knowledge.Supervised Fine-Tuning(SFT) data construction for domain adaptation often relies on heuristic methods, such as GPT-4 annotation or manual data selection, with a data-centric focus on presumed diverse, high-quality datasets. However, these methods overlook the model's inherent knowledge distribution, introducing noise, redundancy, and irrelevant data, leading to a mismatch between the selected data and the model's learning task, resulting in suboptimal performance. To address this, we propose a two-stage model-centric data selection framework, Decomposed Difficulty Data Selection (3DS), which aligns data with the model's knowledge distribution for optimized adaptation. In Stage1, we apply Prompt-Driven Data Selection via Explicit Alignment, where the the model filters irrelevant or redundant data based on its internal knowledge. In Stage2, we perform Decomposed Difficulty Data Selection, where data selection is guided by our defined difficulty decomposition, using three metrics: Instruction Understanding, Response Confidence, and Response Correctness. Additionally, an attention-based importance weighting mechanism captures token importance for more accurate difficulty calibration. This two-stage approach ensures the selected data is not only aligned with the model's knowledge and preferences but also appropriately challenging for the model to learn, leading to more effective and targeted domain adaptation. In the case study of the medical domain, our extensive experiments on real-world healthcare datasets demonstrate the superiority of 3DS over exisiting methods in accuracy by over 5.29%. Our dataset and code will be open-sourced at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/3DS-E67F.
Abstract:We explore how the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) significantly impacts task performance in the field of Natural Language Processing. We focus on two strategies, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Fine-Tuning (FT), and propose the Hypothesis Knowledge Graph Enhanced (HyKGE) framework, leveraging a knowledge graph to enhance medical LLMs. By integrating LLMs and knowledge graphs, HyKGE demonstrates superior performance in addressing accuracy and interpretability challenges, presenting potential applications in the medical domain. Our evaluations using real-world datasets highlight HyKGE's superiority in providing accurate knowledge with precise confidence, particularly in complex and difficult scenarios. The code will be available until published.




Abstract:Extracting medical knowledge from healthcare texts enhances downstream tasks like medical knowledge graph construction and clinical decision-making. However, the construction and application of knowledge extraction models lack automation, reusability and unified management, leading to inefficiencies for researchers and high barriers for non-AI experts such as doctors, to utilize knowledge extraction. To address these issues, we propose a ModelOps-based intelligent medical knowledge extraction framework that offers a low-code system for model selection, training, evaluation and optimization. Specifically, the framework includes a dataset abstraction mechanism based on multi-layer callback functions, a reusable model training, monitoring and management mechanism. We also propose a model recommendation method based on dataset similarity, which helps users quickly find potentially suitable models for a given dataset. Our framework provides convenience for researchers to develop models and simplifies model access for non-AI experts such as doctors.