On the Emotion Understanding of Synthesized Speech

Emotion is a core paralinguistic feature in voice interaction. It is widely believed that emotion understanding models learn fundamental representations that transfer to synthesized speech, making emotion understanding results a plausible reward or evaluation metric for assessing emotional expressiveness in speech synthesis. In this work, we critically examine this assumption by systematically evaluating Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) on synthesized speech across datasets, discriminative and generative SER models, and diverse synthesis models. We find that current SER models can not generalize to synthesized speech, largely because speech token prediction during synthesis induces a representation mismatch between synthesized and human speech. Moreover, generative Speech Language Models (SLMs) tend to infer emotion from textual semantics while ignoring paralinguistic cues. Overall, our findings suggest that existing SER models often exploit non-robust shortcuts rather than capturing fundamental features, and paralinguistic understanding in SLMs remains challenging.

StyleBench: Evaluating Speech Language Models on Conversational Speaking Style Control

Speech language models (SLMs) have significantly extended the interactive capability of text-based Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating paralinguistic information. For more realistic interactive experience with customized styles, current SLMs have managed to interpret and control speaking style intensity from user prompts during the dialogue process. However, there remains a lack of systematic benchmarks that quantifies and evaluates the style intensity control ability in conversations. In this paper, we propose StyleBench, a multi-turn dialogue benchmark for comprehensively evaluating the style intensity control ability across four dimensions: emotion, speed, volume, and pitch. Our results reveal the performance gaps between leading SLMs and omni language models (OLMs), suggesting the underlying reasons and promising approaches for future exploration.

When Scaling Fails: Mitigating Audio Perception Decay of LALMs via Multi-Step Perception-Aware Reasoning

Test-Time Scaling has shown notable efficacy in addressing complex problems through scaling inference compute. However, within Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs), an unintuitive phenomenon exists: post-training models for structured reasoning trajectories results in marginal or even negative gains compared to post-training for direct answering. To investigate it, we introduce CAFE, an evaluation framework designed to precisely quantify audio reasoning errors. Evaluation results reveal LALMs struggle with perception during reasoning and encounter a critical bottleneck: reasoning performance suffers from audio perception decay as reasoning length extends. To address it, we propose MPAR$^2$, a paradigm that encourages dynamic perceptual reasoning and decomposes complex questions into perception-rich sub-problems. Leveraging reinforcement learning, MPAR$^2$ improves perception performance on CAFE from 31.74% to 63.51% and effectively mitigates perception decay, concurrently enhancing reasoning capabilities to achieve a significant 74.59% accuracy on the MMAU benchmark. Further analysis demonstrates that MPAR$^2$ reinforces LALMs to attend to audio input and dynamically adapts reasoning budget to match task complexity.