ResearchPulse: Building Method-Experiment Chains through Multi-Document Scientific Inference

Understanding how scientific ideas evolve requires more than summarizing individual papers-it demands structured, cross-document reasoning over thematically related research. In this work, we formalize multi-document scientific inference, a new task that extracts and aligns motivation, methodology, and experimental results across related papers to reconstruct research development chains. This task introduces key challenges, including temporally aligning loosely structured methods and standardizing heterogeneous experimental tables. We present ResearchPulse, an agent-based framework that integrates instruction planning, scientific content extraction, and structured visualization. It consists of three coordinated agents: a Plan Agent for task decomposition, a Mmap-Agent that constructs motivation-method mind maps, and a Lchart-Agent that synthesizes experimental line charts. To support this task, we introduce ResearchPulse-Bench, a citation-aware benchmark of annotated paper clusters. Experiments show that our system, despite using 7B-scale agents, consistently outperforms strong baselines like GPT-4o in semantic alignment, structural consistency, and visual fidelity. The dataset are available in https://huggingface.co/datasets/ResearchPulse/ResearchPulse-Bench.

StructVRM: Aligning Multimodal Reasoning with Structured and Verifiable Reward Models

Existing Vision-Language Models often struggle with complex, multi-question reasoning tasks where partial correctness is crucial for effective learning. Traditional reward mechanisms, which provide a single binary score for an entire response, are too coarse to guide models through intricate problems with multiple sub-parts. To address this, we introduce StructVRM, a method that aligns multimodal reasoning with Structured and Verifiable Reward Models. At its core is a model-based verifier trained to provide fine-grained, sub-question-level feedback, assessing semantic and mathematical equivalence rather than relying on rigid string matching. This allows for nuanced, partial credit scoring in previously intractable problem formats. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of StructVRM. Our trained model, Seed-StructVRM, achieves state-of-the-art performance on six out of twelve public multimodal benchmarks and our newly curated, high-difficulty STEM-Bench. The success of StructVRM validates that training with structured, verifiable rewards is a highly effective approach for advancing the capabilities of multimodal models in complex, real-world reasoning domains.

ChartMind: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Complex Real-world Multimodal Chart Question Answering

Chart question answering (CQA) has become a critical multimodal task for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of vision-language models. While early approaches have shown promising performance by focusing on visual features or leveraging large-scale pre-training, most existing evaluations rely on rigid output formats and objective metrics, thus ignoring the complex, real-world demands of practical chart analysis. In this paper, we introduce ChartMind, a new benchmark designed for complex CQA tasks in real-world settings. ChartMind covers seven task categories, incorporates multilingual contexts, supports open-domain textual outputs, and accommodates diverse chart formats, bridging the gap between real-world applications and traditional academic benchmarks. Furthermore, we propose a context-aware yet model-agnostic framework, ChartLLM, that focuses on extracting key contextual elements, reducing noise, and enhancing the reasoning accuracy of multimodal large language models. Extensive evaluations on ChartMind and three representative public benchmarks with 14 mainstream multimodal models show our framework significantly outperforms the previous three common CQA paradigms: instruction-following, OCR-enhanced, and chain-of-thought, highlighting the importance of flexible chart understanding for real-world CQA. These findings suggest new directions for developing more robust chart reasoning in future research.

Adapting Step-size: A Unified Perspective to Analyze and Improve Gradient-based Methods for Adversarial Attacks

Learning adversarial examples can be formulated as an optimization problem of maximizing the loss function with some box-constraints. However, for solving this induced optimization problem, the state-of-the-art gradient-based methods such as FGSM, I-FGSM and MI-FGSM look different from their original methods especially in updating the direction, which makes it difficult to understand them and then leaves some theoretical issues to be addressed in viewpoint of optimization. In this paper, from the perspective of adapting step-size, we provide a unified theoretical interpretation of these gradient-based adversarial learning methods. We show that each of these algorithms is in fact a specific reformulation of their original gradient methods but using the step-size rules with only current gradient information. Motivated by such analysis, we present a broad class of adaptive gradient-based algorithms based on the regular gradient methods, in which the step-size strategy utilizing information of the accumulated gradients is integrated. Such adaptive step-size strategies directly normalize the scale of the gradients rather than use some empirical operations. The important benefit is that convergence for the iterative algorithms is guaranteed and then the whole optimization process can be stabilized. The experiments demonstrate that our AdaI-FGM consistently outperforms I-FGSM and AdaMI-FGM remains competitive with MI-FGSM for black-box attacks.

The Role of Momentum Parameters in the Optimal Convergence of Adaptive Polyak's Heavy-ball Methods

The adaptive stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with momentum has been widely adopted in deep learning as well as convex optimization. In practice, the last iterate is commonly used as the final solution to make decisions. However, the available regret analysis and the setting of constant momentum parameters only guarantee the optimal convergence of the averaged solution. In this paper, we fill this theory-practice gap by investigating the convergence of the last iterate (referred to as individual convergence), which is a more difficult task than convergence analysis of the averaged solution. Specifically, in the constrained convex cases, we prove that the adaptive Polyak's Heavy-ball (HB) method, in which only the step size is updated using the exponential moving average strategy, attains an optimal individual convergence rate of $O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}})$, as opposed to the optimality of $O(\frac{\log t}{\sqrt {t}})$ of SGD, where $t$ is the number of iterations. Our new analysis not only shows how the HB momentum and its time-varying weight help us to achieve the acceleration in convex optimization but also gives valuable hints how the momentum parameters should be scheduled in deep learning. Empirical results on optimizing convex functions and training deep networks validate the correctness of our convergence analysis and demonstrate the improved performance of the adaptive HB methods.