SHOVIR: A Benchmark for Evaluating Vision Shortcut Learning in Radiology Report Generation

Current evaluation protocols for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in Radiology Report Generation (RRG) rely on report-level metrics that measure lexical overlap or aggregate clinical correctness. However, such metrics do not test whether individual diagnostic statements stem from the actual pathological evidence visible in the image. This allows models to achieve competitive scores by exploiting learned priors or spurious correlations, a failure mode we refer to as vision shortcut. We introduce SHOVIR, a benchmark for evaluating vision shortcut behavior in RRG. SHOVIR extends two spatially annotated chest X-ray datasets, MIMIC-CXR and PadChest-GR, with per-box CheXpert labels, and defines image-level and disease-level occlusion experiments that contrast baseline performance on clean images against localized, region-specific perturbations. Comparing predictions across these conditions isolates two failure modes at the disease-class level: direct shortcuts, where a finding persists after its visual evidence is removed, and contextual shortcuts, where detection degrades once co-occurring pathologies are occluded despite the target region remaining intact. Benchmarking eight state-of-the-art VLMs, we find that shortcut behavior varies substantially across architectures and datasets. Models achieving the highest baseline report quality do not necessarily rank highest in spatial grounding, revealing that clinically fluent generation can coexist with shallow reliance on visual evidence. These findings expose a blind spot in current RRG evaluation and motivate region-aware assessment protocols.

Cross Modality Image Translation In Medical Imaging Using Generative Frameworks

Medical image-to-image (I2I) translation enables virtual scanning, i.e. the synthesis of a target imaging modality from a source one without additional acquisitions. Despite growing interest, most proposed methods operate on 2D slices, are evaluated on isolated tasks with different experimental set-ups and lack clinical validation. The primary contribution of this work is a reproducible, standardized comparative evaluation of 3D I2I translation methods in oncological imaging, designed to standardize preprocessing, splitting, inference, and multi-level evaluation across heterogeneous clinical tasks. Within this framework, we compare seven generative models, three Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs: Pix2Pix, CycleGAN, SRGAN) and four latent generative models (Latent Diffusion Model, Latent Diffusion Model+ControlNet, Brownian Bridge, Flow Matching), across eleven datasets spanning three anatomical regions (head/neck, lung, pelvis) and four translation directions (cone-beam CT to CT, MRI to CT, CT to PET, MRI T2-weighted to T2-FLAIR), for a total of 77 experiments under uniform training, inference, and evaluation conditions. The results show that GANs outperform latent generative models across all tasks, with SRGAN achieving statistically significant superiority. Our lesion-level analysis reveals that all models struggle with small lesions and that, in CT to PET synthesis, models reproduce lesion shape more reliably than absolute uptake-related intensity. We also performed a Visual Turing test administered to 17 physicians, including 15 radiologists, which shows near-chance classification accuracy (56.7%), confirming that synthetic volumes are largely indistinguishable from real acquisitions, while exposing a dissociation between quantitative metrics and clinical preference.

Virtual Scanning for NSCLC Histology: Investigating the Discriminatory Power of Synthetic PET

Accurate histological differentiation between adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is critical for personalized treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While [$^{18}$F]FDG PET/CT is a standard tool for the clinical evaluation of lung cancer, its utility is often limited by high costs and radiation exposure. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of "virtual scanning" as a feature-enhancement strategy by evaluating whether synthetic PET data can provide complementary feature representations to supplement anatomical CT scans in histological subtype classification. We propose a framework that leverages a 3D Pix2Pix Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), pretrained on the FDG-PET/CT Lesions dataset, to synthesize pseudo-PET volumes from anatomical CT scans. These synthetic volumes are integrated with structural CT data within the MINT framework, a multi-stage intermediate fusion architecture. Our experiments, conducted on a multi-center dataset of 714 subjects, demonstrate that the inclusion of synthetic metabolic features significantly improves classification performance over a CT-only baseline. The multimodal approach achieved a statistically significant increase in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0.489 to 0.591 and improved the Geometric Mean (GMean) from 0.305 to 0.524. These results suggest that synthetic PET scans provide discriminatory metabolic cues that enable deep learning models to exploit complementary cross-modal information, offering a potential feature-enhancement strategy for clinical scenarios where physical PET scans are unavailable.

Handling Missing Modalities in Multimodal Survival Prediction for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Accurate survival prediction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) requires the integration of heterogeneous clinical, radiological, and histopathological information. While Multimodal Deep Learning (MDL) offers a promises for precision prognosis and survival prediction, its clinical applicability is severely limited by small cohort sizes and the presence of missing modalities, often forcing complete-case filtering or aggressive imputation. In this work, we present a missing-aware multimodal survival framework that integrates Computed Tomography (CT), Whole-Slide Histopathology (WSI) Images, and structured clinical variables for overall survival modeling in unresectable stage II-III NSCLC. By leveraging Foundation Models (FM) for modality-specific feature extraction and a missing-aware encoding strategy, the proposed approach enables intermediate multimodal fusion under naturally incomplete modality profiles. The proposed architecture is resilient to missing modalities by design, allowing the model to utilize all available data without being forced to drop patients during training or inference. Experimental results demonstrate that intermediate fusion consistently outperforms unimodal baselines as well as early and late fusion strategies, with the strongest performance achieved by the fusion of WSI and clinical modalities (73.30 C-index). Further analyses of modality importance reveal an adaptive behavior in which less informative modalities, i.e., CT modality, are automatically down-weighted and contribute less to the final survival prediction.

Doctor-in-the-Loop: An Explainable, Multi-View Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Pathological Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a major global health challenge, with high post-surgical recurrence rates underscoring the need for accurate pathological response predictions to guide personalized treatments. Although artificial intelligence models show promise in this domain, their clinical adoption is limited by the lack of medically grounded guidance during training, often resulting in non-explainable intrinsic predictions. To address this, we propose Doctor-in-the-Loop, a novel framework that integrates expert-driven domain knowledge with explainable artificial intelligence techniques, directing the model toward clinically relevant anatomical regions and improving both interpretability and trustworthiness. Our approach employs a gradual multi-view strategy, progressively refining the model's focus from broad contextual features to finer, lesion-specific details. By incorporating domain insights at every stage, we enhance predictive accuracy while ensuring that the model's decision-making process aligns more closely with clinical reasoning. Evaluated on a dataset of NSCLC patients, Doctor-in-the-Loop delivers promising predictive performance and provides transparent, justifiable outputs, representing a significant step toward clinically explainable artificial intelligence in oncology.

A Systematic Review of Intermediate Fusion in Multimodal Deep Learning for Biomedical Applications

Deep learning has revolutionized biomedical research by providing sophisticated methods to handle complex, high-dimensional data. Multimodal deep learning (MDL) further enhances this capability by integrating diverse data types such as imaging, textual data, and genetic information, leading to more robust and accurate predictive models. In MDL, differently from early and late fusion methods, intermediate fusion stands out for its ability to effectively combine modality-specific features during the learning process. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze and formalize current intermediate fusion methods in biomedical applications. We investigate the techniques employed, the challenges faced, and potential future directions for advancing intermediate fusion methods. Additionally, we introduce a structured notation to enhance the understanding and application of these methods beyond the biomedical domain. Our findings are intended to support researchers, healthcare professionals, and the broader deep learning community in developing more sophisticated and insightful multimodal models. Through this review, we aim to provide a foundational framework for future research and practical applications in the dynamic field of MDL.

Multi-Dataset Multi-Task Learning for COVID-19 Prognosis

In the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, leveraging artificial intelligence to predict disease outcomes from chest radiographic images represents a significant scientific aim. The challenge, however, lies in the scarcity of large, labeled datasets with compatible tasks for training deep learning models without leading to overfitting. Addressing this issue, we introduce a novel multi-dataset multi-task training framework that predicts COVID-19 prognostic outcomes from chest X-rays (CXR) by integrating correlated datasets from disparate sources, distant from conventional multi-task learning approaches, which rely on datasets with multiple and correlated labeling schemes. Our framework hypothesizes that assessing severity scores enhances the model's ability to classify prognostic severity groups, thereby improving its robustness and predictive power. The proposed architecture comprises a deep convolutional network that receives inputs from two publicly available CXR datasets, AIforCOVID for severity prognostic prediction and BRIXIA for severity score assessment, and branches into task-specific fully connected output networks. Moreover, we propose a multi-task loss function, incorporating an indicator function, to exploit multi-dataset integration. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach are demonstrated through significant performance improvements in prognosis classification tasks across 18 different convolutional neural network backbones in different evaluation strategies. This improvement is evident over single-task baselines and standard transfer learning strategies, supported by extensive statistical analysis, showing great application potential.