Stitching and dimensionality effects on large artificially generated volume datasets

Generating large images via deep learning requires patching input data to accommodate hardware memory limitations, then assembling output patches, a process that can introduce stitching artifacts when neighboring patches do not align at borders. While these artifacts are known to affect segmentation tasks, their impact on generative models for style-transfer remains poorly understood. We investigated three stitching approaches and two patch dimensionalities (2D vs 3D) using cycleGAN models trained on cryo-electron microscopy datasets. We evaluated both perceptual quality and performance on downstream mitochondria segmentation. Our key findings reveal that: (1) FID scores fail to detect subtle stitching artifacts that significantly impact downstream segmentation performance, (2) 3D models with artifact-free stitching marginally outperform 2D models on downstream tasks, though the improvement barely justifies the computational cost, and (3) 2D models train more stably due to larger batch sizes. Additionally, we demonstrate that ensembling predictions from three orthogonal directions can improve low-quality volumes but provides no benefit for high-quality outputs. These results demonstrate that maximizing generative model performance on large scientific datasets requires careful consideration and mitigation of stitching artifacts, and that perceptual metrics alone are insufficient for evaluating domain adaptation quality in biomedical imaging.

Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation Facilitates Model Understanding

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has produced a diverse landscape of vision transformers (ViTs) whose pretrained representations support a wide range of downstream tasks. Towards a better understanding of these models, a body of work has assessed the mechanics of their self-attention as well as the types of information captured across their representations, revealing, for example, stark differences between models trained with contrastive learning (CL) and masked image modeling (MIM). However, these advances in model understanding have not yet fully permeated the broader community, where insights specific to CL models are sometimes generalized to MIM models. To make model understanding straightforward and intuitive for a broad audience, we propose a simple and easily interpretable visualization protocol. Our protocol is based on visualizing unsupervised semantic segmentation results, yet our goal is not to maximize segmentation performance. Instead, it allows us to convey model behaviors that consistently emerge across images. Benchmarking a diverse set of SSL models across layers and representations, we obtain novel insights into distinct positional biases and scaling behaviors, including strong boundary artifacts in DINOv3-Large model tokens. These insights complement and help communicate a range of previous findings. Our protocol further enables a clear visual distinction between positional effects and the closely related but distinct locality bias, which has been studied much more extensively in the literature. The protocol is publicly available on GitHub and we believe it will catalyze further model understanding for a broad community.

A Comparative Study of Graph Matching Algorithms in Computer Vision

The graph matching optimization problem is an essential component for many tasks in computer vision, such as bringing two deformable objects in correspondence. Naturally, a wide range of applicable algorithms have been proposed in the last decades. Since a common standard benchmark has not been developed, their performance claims are often hard to verify as evaluation on differing problem instances and criteria make the results incomparable. To address these shortcomings, we present a comparative study of graph matching algorithms. We create a uniform benchmark where we collect and categorize a large set of existing and publicly available computer vision graph matching problems in a common format. At the same time we collect and categorize the most popular open-source implementations of graph matching algorithms. Their performance is evaluated in a way that is in line with the best practices for comparing optimization algorithms. The study is designed to be reproducible and extensible to serve as a valuable resource in the future. Our study provides three notable insights: 1.) popular problem instances are exactly solvable in substantially less than 1 second and, therefore, are insufficient for future empirical evaluations; 2.) the most popular baseline methods are highly inferior to the best available methods; 3.) despite the NP-hardness of the problem, instances coming from vision applications are often solvable in a few seconds even for graphs with more than 500 vertices.

Fusion Moves for Graph Matching

We contribute to approximate algorithms for the quadratic assignment problem also known as graph matching. Inspired by the success of the fusion moves technique developed for multilabel discrete Markov random fields, we investigate its applicability to graph matching. In particular, we show how it can be efficiently combined with the dedicated state-of-the-art Lagrange dual methods that have recently shown superior results in computer vision and bio-imaging applications. As our empirical evaluation on a wide variety of graph matching datasets suggests, fusion moves notably improve performance of these methods in terms of speed and quality of the obtained solutions. Hence, this combination results in a state-of-the-art solver for graph matching.

Crowd Sourcing Image Segmentation with iaSTAPLE

We propose a novel label fusion technique as well as a crowdsourcing protocol to efficiently obtain accurate epithelial cell segmentations from non-expert crowd workers. Our label fusion technique simultaneously estimates the true segmentation, the performance levels of individual crowd workers, and an image segmentation model in the form of a pairwise Markov random field. We term our approach image-aware STAPLE (iaSTAPLE) since our image segmentation model seamlessly integrates into the well-known and widely used STAPLE approach. In an evaluation on a light microscopy dataset containing more than 5000 membrane labeled epithelial cells of a fly wing, we show that iaSTAPLE outperforms STAPLE in terms of segmentation accuracy as well as in terms of the accuracy of estimated crowd worker performance levels, and is able to correctly segment 99% of all cells when compared to expert segmentations. These results show that iaSTAPLE is a highly useful tool for crowd sourcing image segmentation.