Energy and Carbon Considerations of Fine-Tuning BERT

Despite the popularity of the `pre-train then fine-tune' paradigm in the NLP community, existing work quantifying energy costs and associated carbon emissions has largely focused on language model pre-training. Although a single pre-training run draws substantially more energy than fine-tuning, fine-tuning is performed more frequently by many more individual actors, and thus must be accounted for when considering the energy and carbon footprint of NLP. In order to better characterize the role of fine-tuning in the landscape of energy and carbon emissions in NLP, we perform a careful empirical study of the computational costs of fine-tuning across tasks, datasets, hardware infrastructure and measurement modalities. Our experimental results allow us to place fine-tuning energy and carbon costs into perspective with respect to pre-training and inference, and outline recommendations to NLP researchers and practitioners who wish to improve their fine-tuning energy efficiency.

To Build Our Future, We Must Know Our Past: Contextualizing Paradigm Shifts in Natural Language Processing

NLP is in a period of disruptive change that is impacting our methodologies, funding sources, and public perception. In this work, we seek to understand how to shape our future by better understanding our past. We study factors that shape NLP as a field, including culture, incentives, and infrastructure by conducting long-form interviews with 26 NLP researchers of varying seniority, research area, institution, and social identity. Our interviewees identify cyclical patterns in the field, as well as new shifts without historical parallel, including changes in benchmark culture and software infrastructure. We complement this discussion with quantitative analysis of citation, authorship, and language use in the ACL Anthology over time. We conclude by discussing shared visions, concerns, and hopes for the future of NLP. We hope that this study of our field's past and present can prompt informed discussion of our community's implicit norms and more deliberate action to consciously shape the future.

The Framework Tax: Disparities Between Inference Efficiency in Research and Deployment

Increased focus on the deployment of machine learning systems has led to rapid improvements in hardware accelerator performance and neural network model efficiency. However, the resulting reductions in floating point operations and increases in computational throughput of accelerators have not directly translated to improvements in real-world inference latency. We demonstrate that these discrepancies can be largely attributed to mis-alignments between model architectures and the capabilities of underlying hardware due to bottlenecks introduced by deep learning frameworks. We denote this phenomena as the \textit{framework tax}, and observe that the disparity is growing as hardware speed increases over time. In this work, we examine this phenomena through a series of case studies analyzing the effects of model design decisions, framework paradigms, and hardware platforms on total model latency. Based on our findings, we provide actionable recommendations to ML researchers and practitioners aimed at narrowing the gap between efficient ML model research and practice.

Train Flat, Then Compress: Sharpness-Aware Minimization Learns More Compressible Models

Model compression by way of parameter pruning, quantization, or distillation has recently gained popularity as an approach for reducing the computational requirements of modern deep neural network models for NLP. Pruning unnecessary parameters has emerged as a simple and effective method for compressing large models that is compatible with a wide variety of contemporary off-the-shelf hardware (unlike quantization), and that requires little additional training (unlike distillation). Pruning approaches typically take a large, accurate model as input, then attempt to discover a smaller subnetwork of that model capable of achieving end-task accuracy comparable to the full model. Inspired by previous work suggesting a connection between simpler, more generalizable models and those that lie within flat basins in the loss landscape, we propose to directly optimize for flat minima while performing task-specific pruning, which we hypothesize should lead to simpler parameterizations and thus more compressible models. In experiments combining sharpness-aware minimization with both iterative magnitude pruning and structured pruning approaches, we show that optimizing for flat minima consistently leads to greater compressibility of parameters compared to standard Adam optimization when fine-tuning BERT models, leading to higher rates of compression with little to no loss in accuracy on the GLUE classification benchmark.