Abstract:Rapid advances in singing voice synthesis have increased unauthorized imitation risks, creating an urgent need for better Singing Voice Deepfake (SingFake) Detection, also known as SVDD. Unlike speech, singing contains complex pitch, wide dynamic range, and timbral variations. Conventional 16 kHz-sampled detectors prove inadequate, as they discard vital high-frequency information. This study presents the first systematic analysis of high-resolution (44.1 kHz sampling rate) audio for SVDD. We propose a joint fullband-subband modeling framework: the fullband captures global context, while subband-specific experts isolate fine-grained synthesis artifacts unevenly distributed across the spectrum. Experiments on the WildSVDD dataset demonstrate that high-frequency subbands provide essential complementary cues. Our framework significantly outperforms 16 kHz-sampled models, proving that high-resolution audio and strategic subband integration are critical for robust in-the-wild detection.
Abstract:Although many models exist to detect singing voice deepfakes (SingFake), how these models operate, particularly with instrumental accompaniment, is unclear. We investigate how instrumental music affects SingFake detection from two perspectives. To investigate the behavioral effect, we test different backbones, unpaired instrumental tracks, and frequency subbands. To analyze the representational effect, we probe how fine-tuning alters encoders' speech and music capabilities. Our results show that instrumental accompaniment acts mainly as data augmentation rather than providing intrinsic cues (e.g., rhythm or harmony). Furthermore, fine-tuning increases reliance on shallow speaker features while reducing sensitivity to content, paralinguistic, and semantic information. These insights clarify how models exploit vocal versus instrumental cues and can inform the design of more interpretable and robust SingFake detection systems.