SIGA: Self-Evolving Coding-Agent Adapters for Scientific Simulation

Advanced scientific simulators expose specialized input languages that turn simulation goals into executable configurations, but learning them can cost domain scientists hours to days. We study simulator setup as a problem of agent-tool interface grounding: what minimal simulator-specific adaptations are needed for an off-the-shelf coding agent to operate real scientific software? Our intuition is that coding agents already know how to navigate files, edit code, run commands, and repair outputs, but they lack the simulator's executable contract: its vocabulary, structural constraints, validation rules, and termination conditions. We introduce SIGA, a Simulator-Interface Grounding Adapter that supplies this contract through retrieval, procedural memory, in-trajectory validation, and validation-enforced termination. We primarily evaluate SIGA on GEOS, an open-source multiphysics simulator used in subsurface science. SIGA produces a complete GEOS deck in about five minutes with TreeSim above 0.90, matching an extended-budget human expert who took about three hours, a roughly 36x wall-clock speedup. On a harder held-out set, grounding raises TreeSim from 0.720 to 0.789, a roughly 10% relative gain over the bare agent, and can reduce the across-seed standard deviation by 16x. Self-evolution further improves SIGA by rewriting adapter contents from prior trajectories, yielding the highest held-out GEOS mean and matching or outperforming the strongest hand-designed configuration. Transfers to OpenFOAM and LAMMPS show that the dominant mechanism shifts by interface: validation matters most when structural completeness is the bottleneck, while memory and retrieval matter most when domain correctness is the bottleneck. These results suggest that lightweight, self-improvable grounding layers can turn general coding agents into practical operators of scientific software.

Agentic AI for Self-Driving Laboratories in Soft Matter: Taxonomy, Benchmarks,and Open Challenges

Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) close the loop between experiment design, automated execution, and data-driven decision making, and they provide a demanding testbed for agentic AI under expensive actions, noisy and delayed feedback, strict feasibility and safety constraints, and non-stationarity. This survey uses soft matter as a representative setting but focuses on the AI questions that arise in real laboratories. We frame SDL autonomy as an agent environment interaction problem with explicit observations, actions, costs, and constraints, and we use this formulation to connect common SDL pipelines to established AI principles. We review the main method families that enable closed loop experimentation, including Bayesian optimization and active learning for sample efficient experiment selection, planning and reinforcement learning for long horizon protocol optimization, and tool using agents that orchestrate heterogeneous instruments and software. We emphasize verifiable and provenance aware policies that support debugging, reproducibility, and safe operation. We then propose a capability driven taxonomy that organizes systems by decision horizon, uncertainty modeling, action parameterization, constraint handling, failure recovery, and human involvement. To enable meaningful comparison, we synthesize benchmark task templates and evaluation metrics that prioritize cost aware performance, robustness to drift, constraint violation behavior, and reproducibility. Finally, we distill lessons from deployed SDLs and outline open challenges in multi-modal representation, calibrated uncertainty, safe exploration, and shared benchmark infrastructure.