ROCS: Request-Oriented Compute Sharing for Efficient Large-Scale Recommendation

Modern recommendation models gain prediction quality by scaling feature-interaction and sequence modules, but production cost constraints cap how far systems can scale. In this work, we propose Request-Oriented Compute Sharing (ROCS), a modeling and inference paradigm that exploits a unique property of recommendation inference: each user request is evaluated against many candidates, while request-side features are shared across candidates. ROCS defers request-candidate interactions as late as possible, isolates candidate-dependent representations, and evaluates substantial portions of the model once per request rather than once per candidate, significantly improving inference efficiency while maintaining or improving prediction quality. To realize this paradigm, we develop Generalized Layer Masking (GLM) to enforce candidate isolation in feature-interaction architectures, and Deep Cross Attention (DCA) to extend request-oriented sharing to sequence architectures. To support efficient GPU deployment, we co-design In-Kernel Broadcast Optimization (IKBO) that significantly accelerates ROCS model execution. Experiments on public benchmarks show that ROCS consistently improves the quality-efficiency tradeoff across recommendation backbones. On production-scale workloads, ROCS achieves up to a 3x QPS improvement on retrieval models without quality degradation and a 0.5% relative LogLoss improvement with a 50% QPS gain on a short-form video ranking model. ROCS has been deployed across large-scale recommendation systems spanning ads and organic surfaces, retrieval and ranking stages, and more than two orders of magnitude in inference complexity, delivering significant online gains at reduced infrastructure cost.

StructureClaw: Traceable LLM Agents and an Executable Benchmark for Structural Engineering Workflows

Addressing a structural-engineering request requires more than a single answer; it requires a chain of interdependent artifacts: interpreted requirements, a computable model, validation records, solver outputs, code-check records, and a final report. Evaluations centered on question answering or script generation rarely verify this complete evidence chain and may therefore reward fluent outputs even when the underlying engineering workflow is incomplete, internally inconsistent, or non-executable. To address this limitation, we present StructureClaw, an artifact-centered workbench in which LLM agents operate through governed engineering skills, typed tools, shared artifact state, and local analysis backends. We also introduce StructureClaw-Bench, an executable benchmark of 150 controlled scenarios spanning standard workflow execution, interactive robustness, and multimodal structural-model reconstruction. A scenario succeeds only when all required artifact- and execution-level assertions pass in a single run. Across ten agent-model configurations, each evaluated on the same 50 standard cases, the average Success Rate rises from 56.8% with the generic-skill baseline to 88.6% with the full automatic workflow. The interactive and multimodal evaluations identify two prominent remaining challenges: safe handling of invalid numerical inputs and fixture-consistent reconstruction of structural models. These findings show that artifact-centered evaluation can expose workflow-level failures that are difficult to identify from final responses alone, providing a more rigorous basis for evaluating and improving structural-engineering agents. The code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/structureclaw/structureclaw.