Task-oriented dialogue systems (TDSs) are assessed mainly in an offline setting or through human evaluation. The evaluation is often limited to single-turn or very time-intensive. As an alternative, user simulators that mimic user behavior allow us to consider a broad set of user goals to generate human-like conversations for simulated evaluation. Employing existing user simulators to evaluate TDSs is challenging as user simulators are primarily designed to optimize dialogue policies for TDSs and have limited evaluation capability. Moreover, the evaluation of user simulators is an open challenge. In this work, we proposes a metaphorical user simulator for endto-end TDS evaluation. We also propose a tester-based evaluation framework to generate variants, i.e., dialogue systems with different capabilities. Our user simulator constructs a metaphorical user model that assists the simulator in reasoning by referring to prior knowledge when encountering new items. We estimate the quality of simulators by checking the simulated interactions between simulators and variants. Our experiments are conducted using three TDS datasets. The metaphorical user simulator demonstrates better consistency with manual evaluation than Agenda-based simulator and Seq2seq model on three datasets; our tester framework demonstrates efficiency, and our approach demonstrates better generalization and scalability.