LegalCiteTrust: Benchmarking Citation Trustworthiness in Chinese Long-Form Legal Research Reports

Long-form legal research reports increasingly rely on LLMs and agentic research systems, but their reliability depends not only on answering the task, but also on whether cited legal authorities are trustworthy. A citation can be risky even when it points to a real source: the report may omit limiting conditions, misdescribe the authority, or use it to support a stronger claim than the source allows. We introduce LegalCiteTrust, a benchmark for evaluating citation trustworthiness in Chinese long-form legal research reports. It contains 72 densely annotated report-level tasks and evaluates reports along three dimensions: Coverage, Support, and Citation Trustworthiness. Citation Trustworthiness is operationalized through citation-level Existence, Fidelity, and Applicability (E/F/A). Experiments on general-purpose LLMs, deep-research systems, and legal-specific systems show that task completion, evidence richness, citation density, and citation reliability expose different system behaviors. Retrieval tools can improve evidence support without reliably improving the Trust score, while E/F/A-based revision improves Trust and Final score more clearly than existence-only filtering. These results suggest that trustworthy legal research generation requires citation-aware evidence governance after retrieval: systems must not only retrieve legal authorities, but also select, describe, and apply them reliably.

Optimizing Retrieval Components for a Shared Backbone via Component-Wise Multi-Stage Training

Recent advances in embedding-based retrieval have enabled dense retrievers to serve as core infrastructure in many industrial systems, where a single retrieval backbone is often shared across multiple downstream applications. In such settings, retrieval quality directly constrains system performance and extensibility, while coupling model selection, deployment, and rollback decisions across applications. In this paper, we present empirical findings and a system-level solution for optimizing retrieval components deployed as a shared backbone in production legal retrieval systems. We adopt a multi-stage optimization framework for dense retrievers and rerankers, and show that different retrieval components exhibit stage-dependent trade-offs. These observations motivate a component-wise, mixed-stage configuration rather than relying on a single uniformly optimal checkpoint. The resulting backbone is validated through end-to-end evaluation and deployed as a shared retrieval service supporting multiple industrial applications.