Revisiting Embodied Chain-of-Thought for Generalizable Robot Manipulation

Embodied chain-of-thought (CoT) aims to bridge linguistic reasoning and robotic control, but its effective form and integration strategy remain underexplored. In this paper, we revisit embodied CoT for vision-language-action (VLA) models at large scale. We construct the largest embodied CoT corpus to date, comprising 978,743 trajectories, 226.3M samples, and 2592.5 hours of robot data. Through extensive experiments, we find that effective embodied CoT should ground high-level semantic understanding into concrete action guidance, such as end-effector movement descriptions and image-space trajectories, while high-level reasoning alone brings only marginal gains. We further show that explicit CoT does not scale reliably when used as an autoregressive action prefix, as it suffers from compounding inference errors and unstable reasoning-action coupling. To address these limitations, we propose ERVLA, a VLA model that uses embodied CoT as representation-shaping supervision rather than mandatory test-time reasoning. ERVLA is trained with a reasoning-dropout strategy, enabling the model to absorb rich reasoning traces during training while predicting actions directly without CoT decoding during inference. This design improves scalability with increasing pre-training data and avoids autoregressive instability. ERVLA achieves state-of-the-art performance on LIBERO-Plus with an 86.9% success rate and reaches 53.2% success rate on VLABench, demonstrating strong out-of-distribution generalization. In real-robot experiments, ERVLA further outperforms competitive state-of-the-art baselines, especially on tasks requiring semantic disambiguation and long-horizon execution.

GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models

We present GLM-4.5, an open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) large language model with 355B total parameters and 32B activated parameters, featuring a hybrid reasoning method that supports both thinking and direct response modes. Through multi-stage training on 23T tokens and comprehensive post-training with expert model iteration and reinforcement learning, GLM-4.5 achieves strong performance across agentic, reasoning, and coding (ARC) tasks, scoring 70.1% on TAU-Bench, 91.0% on AIME 24, and 64.2% on SWE-bench Verified. With much fewer parameters than several competitors, GLM-4.5 ranks 3rd overall among all evaluated models and 2nd on agentic benchmarks. We release both GLM-4.5 (355B parameters) and a compact version, GLM-4.5-Air (106B parameters), to advance research in reasoning and agentic AI systems. Code, models, and more information are available at https://github.com/zai-org/GLM-4.5.

VACT: A Video Automatic Causal Testing System and a Benchmark

With the rapid advancement of text-conditioned Video Generation Models (VGMs), the quality of generated videos has significantly improved, bringing these models closer to functioning as ``*world simulators*'' and making real-world-level video generation more accessible and cost-effective. However, the generated videos often contain factual inaccuracies and lack understanding of fundamental physical laws. While some previous studies have highlighted this issue in limited domains through manual analysis, a comprehensive solution has not yet been established, primarily due to the absence of a generalized, automated approach for modeling and assessing the causal reasoning of these models across diverse scenarios. To address this gap, we propose VACT: an **automated** framework for modeling, evaluating, and measuring the causal understanding of VGMs in real-world scenarios. By combining causal analysis techniques with a carefully designed large language model assistant, our system can assess the causal behavior of models in various contexts without human annotation, which offers strong generalization and scalability. Additionally, we introduce multi-level causal evaluation metrics to provide a detailed analysis of the causal performance of VGMs. As a demonstration, we use our framework to benchmark several prevailing VGMs, offering insight into their causal reasoning capabilities. Our work lays the foundation for systematically addressing the causal understanding deficiencies in VGMs and contributes to advancing their reliability and real-world applicability.