RoboHarness: Memory-Driven Orchestration of Heterogeneous Robot Policies for Long-Horizon Planning

Long-horizon robotic tasks require diverse capabilities that no single policy can reliably provide. Heterogeneous policies offer complementary strengths, but orchestrating them requires reasoning over uncertain capability boundaries and cross-policy distribution mismatch, which are largely overlooked by existing planning methods built on homogeneous, predefined skills with fixed applicability. We propose RoboHarness, a unified framework that encapsulates independently developed robot control systems as reusable agentic skills. Although instantiated in this work with VLAs, RL policies, and task-and-motion planning (TAMP) systems, RoboHarness is designed as a general framework compatible with a broader range of robot policies, such as navigation policies, model predictive controllers, and world-action models. RoboHarness uses multi-modal execution memory and online evidence to characterize policy capability boundaries for capability-aware decomposition and routing. To stabilize policy handoffs, its Memory Bridge retrieves execution trajectories associated with the next policy, estimates its in-distribution state region, and guides the robot toward that region without joint policy retraining. Extensive experiments on three public benchmarks, 500 customized tasks, and 135 real-robot experiments demonstrate effective capability-aware routing and stable policy orchestration, yielding substantial improvements in zero-shot long-horizon planning and out-of-distribution robustness.

One Demo Is All It Takes: Planning Domain Derivation with LLMs from A Single Demonstration

Pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in solving planning problems but often struggle to ensure plan correctness, especially for long-horizon tasks. Meanwhile, traditional robotic task and motion planning (TAMP) frameworks address these challenges more reliably by combining high-level symbolic search with low-level motion planning. At the core of TAMP is the planning domain, an abstract world representation defined through symbolic predicates and actions. However, creating these domains typically involves substantial manual effort and domain expertise, limiting generalizability. We introduce Planning Domain Derivation with LLMs (PDDLLM), a novel approach that combines simulated physical interaction with LLM reasoning to improve planning performance. The method reduces reliance on humans by inferring planning domains from a single annotated task-execution demonstration. Unlike prior domain-inference methods that rely on partially predefined or language descriptions of planning domains, PDDLLM constructs domains entirely from scratch and automatically integrates them with low-level motion planning skills, enabling fully automated long-horizon planning. PDDLLM is evaluated on over 1,200 diverse tasks spanning nine environments and benchmarked against six LLM-based planning baselines, demonstrating superior long-horizon planning performance, lower token costs, and successful deployment on multiple physical robot platforms.

Data-centric Graph Learning: A Survey

The history of artificial intelligence (AI) has witnessed the significant impact of high-quality data on various deep learning models, such as ImageNet for AlexNet and ResNet. Recently, instead of designing more complex neural architectures as model-centric approaches, the attention of AI community has shifted to data-centric ones, which focuses on better processing data to strengthen the ability of neural models. Graph learning, which operates on ubiquitous topological data, also plays an important role in the era of deep learning. In this survey, we comprehensively review graph learning approaches from the data-centric perspective, and aim to answer two crucial questions: (1) when to modify graph data and (2) how to modify graph data to unlock the potential of various graph models. Accordingly, we propose a novel taxonomy based on the stages in the graph learning pipeline, and highlight the processing methods for different data structures in the graph data, i.e., topology, feature and label. Furthermore, we analyze some potential problems embedded in graph data and discuss how to solve them in a data-centric manner. Finally, we provide some promising future directions for data-centric graph learning.