Majorization-Guided Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models under Modality-Specific Shift

Vision-language models transfer well in zero-shot settings, but at deployment the visual and textual branches often shift asymmetrically. Under this condition, entropy-based test-time adaptation can sharpen the fused posterior while increasing error, because an unreliable modality may still dominate fusion. We study this failure mode through a majorization view of multimodal posteriors and cast adaptation as a constrained de-mixing problem on the fused prediction. Based on this view, we propose MG-MTTA, which keeps the backbone frozen and updates only a lightweight gate or adapter. The objective combines fused-posterior entropy minimization with a reliability-aware gate prior built from anchor-based modality consistency and cross-modal conflict. Our analysis gives conditions under which entropy reduction preserves the correct ranking and a threshold that characterizes modality-dominance failure. On the ImageNet-based benchmark, MG-MTTA improves top-1 accuracy from 57.97 to 66.51 under semantics-preserving textual shift and from 21.68 to 26.27 under joint visual-textual shift, while remaining competitive in the visual-only benchmark. These results show that multimodal test-time adaptation should control modality reliability, not just prediction entropy.

CoCo-SAM3: Harnessing Concept Conflict in Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation

SAM3 advances open-vocabulary semantic segmentation by introducing a prompt-driven mask generation paradigm. However, in multi-class open-vocabulary scenarios, masks generated independently from different category prompts lack a unified and inter-class comparable evidence scale, often resulting in overlapping coverage and unstable competition. Moreover, synonymous expressions of the same concept tend to activate inconsistent semantic and spatial evidence, leading to intra-class drift that exacerbates inter-class conflicts and compromises overall inference stability. To address these issues, we propose CoCo-SAM3 (Concept-Conflict SAM3), which explicitly decouples inference into intra-class enhancement and inter-class competition. Our method first aligns and aggregates evidence from synonymous prompts to strengthen concept consistency. It then performs inter-class competition on a unified comparable scale, enabling direct pixel-wise comparisons among all candidate classes. This mechanism stabilizes multi-class inference and effectively mitigates inter-class conflicts. Without requiring any additional training, CoCo-SAM3 achieves consistent improvements across eight open-vocabulary semantic segmentation benchmarks.

TransSplat: Unbalanced Semantic Transport for Language-Driven 3DGS Editing

Language-driven 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) editing provides a more convenient approach for modifying complex scenes in VR/AR. Standard pipelines typically adopt a two-stage strategy: first editing multiple 2D views, and then optimizing the 3D representation to match these edited observations. Existing methods mainly improve view consistency through multi-view feature fusion, attention filtering, or iterative recalibration. However, they fail to explicitly address a more fundamental issue: the semantic correspondence between edited 2D evidence and 3D Gaussians. To tackle this problem, we propose TransSplat, which formulates language-driven 3DGS editing as a multi-view unbalanced semantic transport problem. Specifically, our method establishes correspondences between visible Gaussians and view-specific editing prototypes, thereby explicitly characterizing the semantic relationship between edited 2D evidence and 3D Gaussians. It further recovers a cross-view shared canonical 3D edit field to guide unified 3D appearance updates. In addition, we use transport residuals to suppress erroneous edits in non-target regions, mitigating edit leakage and improving local control precision. Qualitative and quantitative results show that, compared with existing 3D editing methods centered on enhancing view consistency, TransSplat achieves superior performance in local editing accuracy and structural consistency.

Explanation-Guided Adversarial Training for Robust and Interpretable Models

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable performance in many tasks, yet they often behave as opaque black boxes. Explanation-guided learning (EGL) methods steer DNNs using human-provided explanations or supervision on model attributions. These approaches improve interpretability but typically assume benign inputs and incur heavy annotation costs. In contrast, both predictions and saliency maps of DNNs could dramatically alter facing imperceptible perturbations or unseen patterns. Adversarial training (AT) can substantially improve robustness, but it does not guarantee that model decisions rely on semantically meaningful features. In response, we propose Explanation-Guided Adversarial Training (EGAT), a unified framework that integrates the strength of AT and EGL to simultaneously improve prediction performance, robustness, and explanation quality. EGAT generates adversarial examples on the fly while imposing explanation-based constraints on the model. By jointly optimizing classification performance, adversarial robustness, and attributional stability, EGAT is not only more resistant to unexpected cases, including adversarial attacks and out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios, but also offer human-interpretable justifications for the decisions. We further formalize EGAT within the Probably Approximately Correct learning framework, demonstrating theoretically that it yields more stable predictions under unexpected situations compared to standard AT. Empirical evaluations on OOD benchmark datasets show that EGAT consistently outperforms competitive baselines in both clean accuracy and adversarial accuracy +37% while producing more semantically meaningful explanations, and requiring only a limited increase +16% in training time.

From Attribution to Action: Jointly ALIGNing Predictions and Explanations

Explanation-guided learning (EGL) has shown promise in aligning model predictions with interpretable reasoning, particularly in computer vision tasks. However, most approaches rely on external annotations or heuristic-based segmentation to supervise model explanations, which can be noisy, imprecise and difficult to scale. In this work, we provide both empirical and theoretical evidence that low-quality supervision signals can degrade model performance rather than improve it. In response, we propose ALIGN, a novel framework that jointly trains a classifier and a masker in an iterative manner. The masker learns to produce soft, task-relevant masks that highlight informative regions, while the classifier is optimized for both prediction accuracy and alignment between its saliency maps and the learned masks. By leveraging high-quality masks as guidance, ALIGN improves both interpretability and generalizability, showing its superiority across various settings. Experiments on the two domain generalization benchmarks, VLCS and Terra Incognita, show that ALIGN consistently outperforms six strong baselines in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings. Besides, ALIGN also yields superior explanation quality concerning sufficiency and comprehensiveness, highlighting its effectiveness in producing accurate and interpretable models.