A Thorough Comparison of Cross-Encoders and LLMs for Reranking SPLADE

We present a comparative study between cross-encoder and LLMs rerankers in the context of re-ranking effective SPLADE retrievers. We conduct a large evaluation on TREC Deep Learning datasets and out-of-domain datasets such as BEIR and LoTTE. In the first set of experiments, we show how cross-encoder rerankers are hard to distinguish when it comes to re-rerank SPLADE on MS MARCO. Observations shift in the out-of-domain scenario, where both the type of model and the number of documents to re-rank have an impact on effectiveness. Then, we focus on listwise rerankers based on Large Language Models -- especially GPT-4. While GPT-4 demonstrates impressive (zero-shot) performance, we show that traditional cross-encoders remain very competitive. Overall, our findings aim to to provide a more nuanced perspective on the recent excitement surrounding LLM-based re-rankers -- by positioning them as another factor to consider in balancing effectiveness and efficiency in search systems.

SPLADE-v3: New baselines for SPLADE

A companion to the release of the latest version of the SPLADE library. We describe changes to the training structure and present our latest series of models -- SPLADE-v3. We compare this new version to BM25, SPLADE++, as well as re-rankers, and showcase its effectiveness via a meta-analysis over more than 40 query sets. SPLADE-v3 further pushes the limit of SPLADE models: it is statistically significantly more effective than both BM25 and SPLADE++, while comparing well to cross-encoder re-rankers. Specifically, it gets more than 40 MRR@10 on the MS MARCO dev set, and improves by 2% the out-of-domain results on the BEIR benchmark.

Benchmarking Middle-Trained Language Models for Neural Search

Middle training methods aim to bridge the gap between the Masked Language Model (MLM) pre-training and the final finetuning for retrieval. Recent models such as CoCondenser, RetroMAE, and LexMAE argue that the MLM task is not sufficient enough to pre-train a transformer network for retrieval and hence propose various tasks to do so. Intrigued by those novel methods, we noticed that all these models used different finetuning protocols, making it hard to assess the benefits of middle training. We propose in this paper a benchmark of CoCondenser, RetroMAE, and LexMAE, under the same finetuning conditions. We compare both dense and sparse approaches under various finetuning protocols and middle training on different collections (MS MARCO, Wikipedia or Tripclick). We use additional middle training baselines, such as a standard MLM finetuning on the retrieval collection, optionally augmented by a CLS predicting the passage term frequency. For the sparse approach, our study reveals that there is almost no statistical difference between those methods: the more effective the finetuning procedure is, the less difference there is between those models. For the dense approach, RetroMAE using MS MARCO as middle-training collection shows excellent results in almost all the settings. Finally, we show that middle training on the retrieval collection, thus adapting the language model to it, is a critical factor. Overall, a better experimental setup should be adopted to evaluate middle training methods. Code available at https://github.com/naver/splade/tree/benchmarch-SIGIR23

The tale of two MS MARCO -- and their unfair comparisons

The MS MARCO-passage dataset has been the main large-scale dataset open to the IR community and it has fostered successfully the development of novel neural retrieval models over the years. But, it turns out that two different corpora of MS MARCO are used in the literature, the official one and a second one where passages were augmented with titles, mostly due to the introduction of the Tevatron code base. However, the addition of titles actually leaks relevance information, while breaking the original guidelines of the MS MARCO-passage dataset. In this work, we investigate the differences between the two corpora and demonstrate empirically that they make a significant difference when evaluating a new method. In other words, we show that if a paper does not properly report which version is used, reproducing fairly its results is basically impossible. Furthermore, given the current status of reviewing, where monitoring state-of-the-art results is of great importance, having two different versions of a dataset is a large problem. This is why this paper aims to report the importance of this issue so that researchers can be made aware of this problem and appropriately report their results.

A Static Pruning Study on Sparse Neural Retrievers

Sparse neural retrievers, such as DeepImpact, uniCOIL and SPLADE, have been introduced recently as an efficient and effective way to perform retrieval with inverted indexes. They aim to learn term importance and, in some cases, document expansions, to provide a more effective document ranking compared to traditional bag-of-words retrieval models such as BM25. However, these sparse neural retrievers have been shown to increase the computational costs and latency of query processing compared to their classical counterparts. To mitigate this, we apply a well-known family of techniques for boosting the efficiency of query processing over inverted indexes: static pruning. We experiment with three static pruning strategies, namely document-centric, term-centric and agnostic pruning, and we assess, over diverse datasets, that these techniques still work with sparse neural retrievers. In particular, static pruning achieves $2\times$ speedup with negligible effectiveness loss ($\leq 2\%$ drop) and, depending on the use case, even $4\times$ speedup with minimal impact on the effectiveness ($\leq 8\%$ drop). Moreover, we show that neural rerankers are robust to candidates from statically pruned indexes.

AToMiC: An Image/Text Retrieval Test Collection to Support Multimedia Content Creation

This paper presents the AToMiC (Authoring Tools for Multimedia Content) dataset, designed to advance research in image/text cross-modal retrieval. While vision-language pretrained transformers have led to significant improvements in retrieval effectiveness, existing research has relied on image-caption datasets that feature only simplistic image-text relationships and underspecified user models of retrieval tasks. To address the gap between these oversimplified settings and real-world applications for multimedia content creation, we introduce a new approach for building retrieval test collections. We leverage hierarchical structures and diverse domains of texts, styles, and types of images, as well as large-scale image-document associations embedded in Wikipedia. We formulate two tasks based on a realistic user model and validate our dataset through retrieval experiments using baseline models. AToMiC offers a testbed for scalable, diverse, and reproducible multimedia retrieval research. Finally, the dataset provides the basis for a dedicated track at the 2023 Text Retrieval Conference (TREC), and is publicly available at https://github.com/TREC-AToMiC/AToMiC.

Parameter-Efficient Sparse Retrievers and Rerankers using Adapters

Parameter-Efficient transfer learning with Adapters have been studied in Natural Language Processing (NLP) as an alternative to full fine-tuning. Adapters are memory-efficient and scale well with downstream tasks by training small bottle-neck layers added between transformer layers while keeping the large pretrained language model (PLMs) frozen. In spite of showing promising results in NLP, these methods are under-explored in Information Retrieval. While previous studies have only experimented with dense retriever or in a cross lingual retrieval scenario, in this paper we aim to complete the picture on the use of adapters in IR. First, we study adapters for SPLADE, a sparse retriever, for which adapters not only retain the efficiency and effectiveness otherwise achieved by finetuning, but are memory-efficient and orders of magnitude lighter to train. We observe that Adapters-SPLADE not only optimizes just 2\% of training parameters, but outperforms fully fine-tuned counterpart and existing parameter-efficient dense IR models on IR benchmark datasets. Secondly, we address domain adaptation of neural retrieval thanks to adapters on cross-domain BEIR datasets and TripClick. Finally, we also consider knowledge sharing between rerankers and first stage rankers. Overall, our study complete the examination of adapters for neural IR

Naver Labs Europe (SPLADE) @ TREC NeuCLIR 2022

This paper describes our participation in the 2022 TREC NeuCLIR challenge. We submitted runs to two out of the three languages (Farsi and Russian), with a focus on first-stage rankers and comparing mono-lingual strategies to Adhoc ones. For monolingual runs, we start from pretraining models on the target language using MLM+FLOPS and then finetuning using the MSMARCO translated to the language either with ColBERT or SPLADE as the retrieval model. While for the Adhoc task, we test both query translation (to the target language) and back-translation of the documents (to English). Initial result analysis shows that the monolingual strategy is strong, but that for the moment Adhoc achieved the best results, with back-translating documents being better than translating queries.

Naver Labs Europe (SPLADE) @ TREC Deep Learning 2022

This paper describes our participation to the 2022 TREC Deep Learning challenge. We submitted runs to all four tasks, with a focus on the full retrieval passage task. The strategy is almost the same as 2021, with first stage retrieval being based around SPLADE, with some added ensembling with ColBERTv2 and DocT5. We also use the same strategy of last year for the second stage, with an ensemble of re-rankers trained using hard negatives selected by SPLADE. Initial result analysis show that the strategy is still strong, but is still unclear to us what next steps should we take.

Query Performance Prediction for Neural IR: Are We There Yet?

Evaluation in Information Retrieval relies on post-hoc empirical procedures, which are time-consuming and expensive operations. To alleviate this, Query Performance Prediction (QPP) models have been developed to estimate the performance of a system without the need for human-made relevance judgements. Such models, usually relying on lexical features from queries and corpora, have been applied to traditional sparse IR methods - with various degrees of success. With the advent of neural IR and large Pre-trained Language Models, the retrieval paradigm has significantly shifted towards more semantic signals. In this work, we study and analyze to what extent current QPP models can predict the performance of such systems. Our experiments consider seven traditional bag-of-words and seven BERT-based IR approaches, as well as nineteen state-of-the-art QPPs evaluated on two collections, Deep Learning '19 and Robust '04. Our findings show that QPPs perform statistically significantly worse on neural IR systems. In settings where semantic signals are prominent (e.g., passage retrieval), their performance on neural models drops by as much as 10% compared to bag-of-words approaches. On top of that, in lexical-oriented scenarios, QPPs fail to predict performance for neural IR systems on those queries where they differ from traditional approaches the most.