On the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AI

The field of deep generative modeling has grown rapidly and consistently over the years. With the availability of massive amounts of training data coupled with advances in scalable unsupervised learning paradigms, recent large-scale generative models show tremendous promise in synthesizing high-resolution images and text, as well as structured data such as videos and molecules. However, we argue that current large-scale generative AI models do not sufficiently address several fundamental issues that hinder their widespread adoption across domains. In this work, we aim to identify key unresolved challenges in modern generative AI paradigms that should be tackled to further enhance their capabilities, versatility, and reliability. By identifying these challenges, we aim to provide researchers with valuable insights for exploring fruitful research directions, thereby fostering the development of more robust and accessible generative AI solutions.

Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal?

Deep learning-based methods have achieved a breakthrough in image anomaly detection, but their complexity introduces a considerable challenge to understanding why an instance is predicted to be anomalous. We introduce a novel explanation method that generates multiple counterfactual examples for each anomaly, capturing diverse concepts of anomalousness. A counterfactual example is a modification of the anomaly that is perceived as normal by the anomaly detector. The method provides a high-level semantic explanation of the mechanism that triggered the anomaly detector, allowing users to explore "what-if scenarios." Qualitative and quantitative analyses across various image datasets show that the method applied to state-of-the-art anomaly detectors can achieve high-quality semantic explanations of detectors.

Evaluating Dynamic Topic Models

There is a lack of quantitative measures to evaluate the progression of topics through time in dynamic topic models (DTMs). Filling this gap, we propose a novel evaluation measure for DTMs that analyzes the changes in the quality of each topic over time. Additionally, we propose an extension combining topic quality with the model's temporal consistency. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed measure by applying it to synthetic data and data from existing DTMs. We also conducted a human evaluation, which indicates that the proposed measure correlates well with human judgment. Our findings may help in identifying changing topics, evaluating different DTMs, and guiding future research in this area.

Text Style Transfer Evaluation Using Large Language Models

Text Style Transfer (TST) is challenging to evaluate because the quality of the generated text manifests itself in multiple aspects, each of which is hard to measure individually: style transfer accuracy, content preservation, and overall fluency of the text. Human evaluation is the gold standard in TST evaluation; however, it is expensive, and the results are difficult to reproduce. Numerous automated metrics are employed to assess performance in these aspects, serving as substitutes for human evaluation. However, the correlation between many of these automated metrics and human evaluations remains unclear, raising doubts about their effectiveness as reliable benchmarks. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to not only match but also surpass the average human performance across a wide range of unseen tasks. This suggests that LLMs have the potential to serve as a viable alternative to human evaluation and other automated metrics. We assess the performance of different LLMs on TST evaluation by employing multiple input prompts and comparing their results. Our findings indicate that (even zero-shot) prompting correlates strongly with human evaluation and often surpasses the performance of (other) automated metrics. Additionally, we propose the ensembling of prompts and show it increases the robustness of TST evaluation.This work contributes to the ongoing efforts in evaluating LLMs on diverse tasks, which includes a discussion of failure cases and limitations.

A Call for Standardization and Validation of Text Style Transfer Evaluation

Text Style Transfer (TST) evaluation is, in practice, inconsistent. Therefore, we conduct a meta-analysis on human and automated TST evaluation and experimentation that thoroughly examines existing literature in the field. The meta-analysis reveals a substantial standardization gap in human and automated evaluation. In addition, we also find a validation gap: only few automated metrics have been validated using human experiments. To this end, we thoroughly scrutinize both the standardization and validation gap and reveal the resulting pitfalls. This work also paves the way to close the standardization and validation gap in TST evaluation by calling out requirements to be met by future research.

Deep Anomaly Detection on Tennessee Eastman Process Data

This paper provides the first comprehensive evaluation and analysis of modern (deep-learning) unsupervised anomaly detection methods for chemical process data. We focus on the Tennessee Eastman process dataset, which has been a standard litmus test to benchmark anomaly detection methods for nearly three decades. Our extensive study will facilitate choosing appropriate anomaly detection methods in industrial applications.

Potential-based reward shaping for learning to play text-based adventure games

Text-based games are a popular testbed for language-based reinforcement learning (RL). In previous work, deep Q-learning is commonly used as the learning agent. Q-learning algorithms are challenging to apply to complex real-world domains due to, for example, their instability in training. Therefore, in this paper, we adapt the soft-actor-critic (SAC) algorithm to the text-based environment. To deal with sparse extrinsic rewards from the environment, we combine it with a potential-based reward shaping technique to provide more informative (dense) reward signals to the RL agent. We apply our method to play difficult text-based games. The SAC method achieves higher scores than the Q-learning methods on many games with only half the number of training steps. This shows that it is well-suited for text-based games. Moreover, we show that the reward shaping technique helps the agent to learn the policy faster and achieve higher scores. In particular, we consider a dynamically learned value function as a potential function for shaping the learner's original sparse reward signals.

Ordinal Regression for Difficulty Estimation of StepMania Levels

StepMania is a popular open-source clone of a rhythm-based video game. As is common in popular games, there is a large number of community-designed levels. It is often difficult for players and level authors to determine the difficulty level of such community contributions. In this work, we formalize and analyze the difficulty prediction task on StepMania levels as an ordinal regression (OR) task. We standardize a more extensive and diverse selection of this data resulting in five data sets, two of which are extensions of previous work. We evaluate many competitive OR and non-OR models, demonstrating that neural network-based models significantly outperform the state of the art and that StepMania-level data makes for an excellent test bed for deep OR models. We conclude with a user experiment showing our trained models' superiority over human labeling.