Privileged, but Biased: How PI-Conditioned Teachers Break Self-Distillation

Self-distillation (SD) has emerged as a compute-efficient alternative to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards: a self-teacher, conditioned on privileged information (PI) about the answer such as a reference solution, supplies dense per-token supervision to a student that never sees it. Reported gains, however, come almost exclusively from narrow, low-difficulty settings, leaving open a basic question: as a lone objective, with no reward term, does SD teach anything? We reproduce SDPO's reported gains in its easy setting, then apply the identical setup to difficult tasks and find that it does not. Across question answering, mathematics, coding, and multi-turn agentic tool use, across reasoning modes, model sizes, and forms of PI, and under both the SDPO and OPSD recipes, the per-token loss falls steadily while validation accuracy does not improve and typically degrades. We explain this failure through a single causal chain from the loss to the model it produces. The chain begins with PI bias: having seen one particular reference solution, the teacher's per-token target is pulled toward that trajectory rather than toward correctness in general, an effect we quantify with a PI Bias Score. Trained to match this target everywhere, the student's objective becomes nearly blind to whether a rollout is correct, and the loss it assigns falls mostly on low-information tokens like stopwords, punctuation, uncertainty markers, rather than those that determine the answer; within correct rollouts the exploratory tokens incur the highest divergence, so it penalizes the hesitation that reasoning requires. The result is a flatter, less decisive student that is no better at reasoning: as a lone objective, SD optimizes a signal decoupled from task success.

Echoverse: Deep, Evolving Environments for Training Computer-Use Agents at Scale

Computer-use agents learn from what their actions change, so training one needs applications it can act on, break and reset. The applications that matter most are login-gated and stateful, so synthetic environments stand in for them. Recent pipelines generate such environments in bulk, which moves the bottleneck from how many exist to what is inside each one. The returns, we find, come from three properties: how much behavioural depth an environment carries, whether it targets the interaction an agent actually fails, and whether it improves alongside the model. We present Echoverse, which compiles specifications into stateful applications whose tasks are graded against the application's own database, and a co-evolution loop that reads every graded rollout twice: as repairs to the environment, its tasks and its verifier, and as training signal for the model. Trained on twelve such environments, a 9B model improves from $36.5\%$ to $67.1\%$ across fourteen evaluation splits, within fourteen points of the much larger frontier model that taught it. We examine each property in turn. On the same domains, shallow environments push live-site accuracy below the base model ($80.0 \to 75.0$) while deep ones raise it ($80.0 \to 85.0$ and $48.0 \to 65.0$); drilling one interface control across many renderings transfers to held-out widget families and to the open web; and repairing a single environment lifts the model trained on it from $16.2\%$ to $38.5\%$. The same worlds serve as reinforcement-learning environments, where a reward combining the grounded verifier with a dense per-step judge raises held-out score from $58.8\%$ to $68.0\%$. We release four environments as a benchmark, with their applications, seed data and grounded graders. Code: https://aka.ms/echoverse

Dialogue to Discovery: Attribute-Aware Preference Elicitation for Conversational Product Search Assistants

Conversational product search assistants offer a more expressive, natural, and interactive alternative to traditional keyword-based product search. With limited screen space, showing only a few items increases the need for precise preference elicitation, which can prolong conversations, leading to user frustration and session abandonment. Conversely, rushing to recommend items without a clear understanding of preferences risks poor matches and a degraded user experience. We present Dialogue to Discovery (D2D), an attribute-oriented preference elicitation framework that dynamically exploits the structure of product attributes to efficiently steer conversations toward the user's desired item. D2D adaptively prioritizes the most informative queries and strategically times product recommendations, reducing premature or off-target suggestions that harm engagement. To evaluate D2D, we curate three datasets from the Amazon Reviews corpus. In simulated conversations modelled using a multi-factor utilitarian patience framework, D2D achieves a 22.2-29.9% improvement in target-finding accuracy, 6.6-16.1% reduction in abandonment, and 27.5% shorter average conversations over the state-of-the-art baselines. A complementary user study further confirms significant gains in both user satisfaction and perceived efficiency.

LLM driven Text-to-Table Generation through Sub-Tasks Guidance and Iterative Refinement

Transforming unstructured text into structured data is a complex task, requiring semantic understanding, reasoning, and structural comprehension. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer potential, they often struggle with handling ambiguous or domain-specific data, maintaining table structure, managing long inputs, and addressing numerical reasoning. This paper proposes an efficient system for LLM-driven text-to-table generation that leverages novel prompting techniques. Specifically, the system incorporates two key strategies: breaking down the text-to-table task into manageable, guided sub-tasks and refining the generated tables through iterative self-feedback. We show that this custom task decomposition allows the model to address the problem in a stepwise manner and improves the quality of the generated table. Furthermore, we discuss the benefits and potential risks associated with iterative self-feedback on the generated tables while highlighting the trade-offs between enhanced performance and computational cost. Our methods achieve strong results compared to baselines on two complex text-to-table generation datasets available in the public domain.

CASE: Curricular Data Pre-training for Building Generative and Discriminative Assistive Psychology Expert Models

The limited availability of psychologists necessitates efficient identification of individuals requiring urgent mental healthcare. This study explores the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) pipelines to analyze text data from online mental health forums used for consultations. By analyzing forum posts, these pipelines can flag users who may require immediate professional attention. A crucial challenge in this domain is data privacy and scarcity. To address this, we propose utilizing readily available curricular texts used in institutes specializing in mental health for pre-training the NLP pipelines. This helps us mimic the training process of a psychologist. Our work presents two models: a discriminative BERT-based model called CASE-BERT that flags potential mental health disorders based on forum text, and a generative model called CASE-Gemma that extracts key features for a preliminary diagnosis. CASE-BERT demonstrates superior performance compared to existing methods, achieving an f1 score of 0.91 for Depression and 0.88 for Anxiety, two of the most commonly reported mental health disorders. CASE-Gemma can achieve a BERT Score of 0.849 on generating diagnoses based on forum text. The effectiveness of CASE-Gemma is evaluated through both human evaluation and qualitative methods, with the collaboration of clinical psychologists who provide us with a set of annotated data for fine-tuning and evaluation. Our code is available at https://github.com/sarthakharne/CASE