Integrating Chain-of-Thought into Generative Retrieval: A Preliminary Study

While generative retrieval (GR) demonstrates competitive performance on standard retrieval benchmarks, existing approaches directly map queries to document identifiers (docids) without intermediate deliberation, limiting their effectiveness for complex queries that require multi-step reasoning. As a preliminary study on integrating chain-of-thought (CoT) into generative retrieval, we introduce ThinkGR, a unified framework that interleaves CoT with docid generation, enabling iterative thinking and retrieval within a single generative process. To bridge the gap between free-form thought generation and structured retrieval targets, we design (1) a hybrid decoding strategy that dynamically switches between unconstrained thought generation and constrained docid decoding, and (2) a two-phase training approach that first aligns thought-retrieval patterns through supervised fine-tuning, then optimizes thought quality via retrieval-grounded reinforcement learning. Experiments on four multi-hop retrieval benchmarks demonstrate that ThinkGR achieves state-of-the-art performance with an average improvement of +6.86\%. Our work opens new avenues for enhancing generative retrieval with explicit deliberation capabilities, with promising implications for retrieval tasks requiring complex reasoning.

CoMAI: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Robust and Equitable Interview Evaluation

Ensuring robust and fair interview assessment remains a key challenge in AI-driven evaluation. This paper presents CoMAI, a general-purpose multi-agent interview framework designed for diverse assessment scenarios. In contrast to monolithic single-agent systems based on large language models (LLMs), CoMAI employs a modular task-decomposition architecture coordinated through a centralized finite-state machine. The system comprises four agents specialized in question generation, security, scoring, and summarization. These agents work collaboratively to provide multi-layered security defenses against prompt injection, support multidimensional evaluation with adaptive difficulty adjustment, and enable rubric-based structured scoring that reduces subjective bias. Experimental results demonstrate that CoMAI achieved 90.47% accuracy, 83.33% recall, and 84.41% candidate satisfaction. These results highlight CoMAI as a robust, fair, and interpretable paradigm for AI-driven interview assessment.