AV-CPL: Continuous Pseudo-Labeling for Audio-Visual Speech Recognition

Audio-visual speech contains synchronized audio and visual information that provides cross-modal supervision to learn representations for both automatic speech recognition (ASR) and visual speech recognition (VSR). We introduce continuous pseudo-labeling for audio-visual speech recognition (AV-CPL), a semi-supervised method to train an audio-visual speech recognition (AVSR) model on a combination of labeled and unlabeled videos with continuously regenerated pseudo-labels. Our models are trained for speech recognition from audio-visual inputs and can perform speech recognition using both audio and visual modalities, or only one modality. Our method uses the same audio-visual model for both supervised training and pseudo-label generation, mitigating the need for external speech recognition models to generate pseudo-labels. AV-CPL obtains significant improvements in VSR performance on the LRS3 dataset while maintaining practical ASR and AVSR performance. Finally, using visual-only speech data, our method is able to leverage unlabeled visual speech to improve VSR.

Unsupervised ASR via Cross-Lingual Pseudo-Labeling

Recent work has shown that it is possible to train an $\textit{unsupervised}$ automatic speech recognition (ASR) system using only unpaired audio and text. Existing unsupervised ASR methods assume that no labeled data can be used for training. We argue that even if one does not have any labeled audio for a given language, there is $\textit{always}$ labeled data available for other languages. We show that it is possible to use character-level acoustic models (AMs) from other languages to bootstrap an $\textit{unsupervised}$ AM in a new language. Here, "unsupervised" means no labeled audio is available for the $\textit{target}$ language. Our approach is based on two key ingredients: (i) generating pseudo-labels (PLs) of the $\textit{target}$ language using some $\textit{other}$ language AM and (ii) constraining these PLs with a $\textit{target language model}$. Our approach is effective on Common Voice: e.g. transfer of English AM to Swahili achieves 18% WER. It also outperforms character-based wav2vec-U 2.0 by 15% absolute WER on LJSpeech with 800h of labeled German data instead of 60k hours of unlabeled English data.

Continuous Soft Pseudo-Labeling in ASR

Continuous pseudo-labeling (PL) algorithms such as slimIPL have recently emerged as a powerful strategy for semi-supervised learning in speech recognition. In contrast with earlier strategies that alternated between training a model and generating pseudo-labels (PLs) with it, here PLs are generated in end-to-end manner as training proceeds, improving training speed and the accuracy of the final model. PL shares a common theme with teacher-student models such as distillation in that a teacher model generates targets that need to be mimicked by the student model being trained. However, interestingly, PL strategies in general use hard-labels, whereas distillation uses the distribution over labels as the target to mimic. Inspired by distillation we expect that specifying the whole distribution (aka soft-labels) over sequences as the target for unlabeled data, instead of a single best pass pseudo-labeled transcript (hard-labels) should improve PL performance and convergence. Surprisingly and unexpectedly, we find that soft-labels targets can lead to training divergence, with the model collapsing to a degenerate token distribution per frame. We hypothesize that the reason this does not happen with hard-labels is that training loss on hard-labels imposes sequence-level consistency that keeps the model from collapsing to the degenerate solution. In this paper, we show several experiments that support this hypothesis, and experiment with several regularization approaches that can ameliorate the degenerate collapse when using soft-labels. These approaches can bring the accuracy of soft-labels closer to that of hard-labels, and while they are unable to outperform them yet, they serve as a useful framework for further improvements.

More Speaking or More Speakers?

Self-training (ST) and self-supervised learning (SSL) methods have demonstrated strong improvements in automatic speech recognition (ASR). In spite of these advances, to the best of our knowledge, there is no analysis of how the composition of the labelled and unlabelled datasets used in these methods affects the results. In this work we aim to analyse the effect of numbers of speakers in the training data on a recent SSL algorithm (wav2vec 2.0), and a recent ST algorithm (slimIPL). We perform a systematic analysis on both labeled and unlabeled data by varying the number of speakers while keeping the number of hours fixed and vice versa. Our findings suggest that SSL requires a large amount of unlabeled data to produce high accuracy results, while ST requires a sufficient number of speakers in the labelled data, especially in the low-regime setting. In this manner these two approaches improve supervised learning in different regimes of dataset composition.

Continuous Pseudo-Labeling from the Start

Self-training (ST), or pseudo-labeling has sparked significant interest in the automatic speech recognition (ASR) community recently because of its success in harnessing unlabeled data. Unlike prior semi-supervised learning approaches that relied on iteratively regenerating pseudo-labels (PLs) from a trained model and using them to train a new model, recent state-of-the-art methods perform `continuous training' where PLs are generated using a very recent version of the model being trained. Nevertheless, these approaches still rely on bootstrapping the ST using an initial supervised learning phase where the model is trained on labeled data alone. We believe this has the potential for over-fitting to the labeled dataset in low resource settings and that ST from the start of training should reduce over-fitting. In this paper we show how we can do this by dynamically controlling the evolution of PLs during the training process in ASR. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that shows the feasibility of generating PLs from the very start of the training. We are able to achieve this using two techniques that avoid instabilities which lead to degenerate models that do not generalize. Firstly, we control the evolution of PLs through a curriculum that uses the online changes in PLs to control the membership of the cache of PLs and improve generalization. Secondly, we find that by sampling transcriptions from the predictive distribution, rather than only using the best transcription, we can stabilize training further. With these techniques, our ST models match prior works without an external language model.

Flashlight: Enabling Innovation in Tools for Machine Learning

As the computational requirements for machine learning systems and the size and complexity of machine learning frameworks increases, essential framework innovation has become challenging. While computational needs have driven recent compiler, networking, and hardware advancements, utilization of those advancements by machine learning tools is occurring at a slower pace. This is in part due to the difficulties involved in prototyping new computational paradigms with existing frameworks. Large frameworks prioritize machine learning researchers and practitioners as end users and pay comparatively little attention to systems researchers who can push frameworks forward -- we argue that both are equally important stakeholders. We introduce Flashlight, an open-source library built to spur innovation in machine learning tools and systems by prioritizing open, modular, customizable internals and state-of-the-art, research-ready models and training setups across a variety of domains. Flashlight allows systems researchers to rapidly prototype and experiment with novel ideas in machine learning computation and has low overhead, competing with and often outperforming other popular machine learning frameworks. We see Flashlight as a tool enabling research that can benefit widely used libraries downstream and bring machine learning and systems researchers closer together.

Star Temporal Classification: Sequence Classification with Partially Labeled Data

We develop an algorithm which can learn from partially labeled and unsegmented sequential data. Most sequential loss functions, such as Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC), break down when many labels are missing. We address this problem with Star Temporal Classification (STC) which uses a special star token to allow alignments which include all possible tokens whenever a token could be missing. We express STC as the composition of weighted finite-state transducers (WFSTs) and use GTN (a framework for automatic differentiation with WFSTs) to compute gradients. We perform extensive experiments on automatic speech recognition. These experiments show that STC can recover most of the performance of supervised baseline when up to 70% of the labels are missing. We also perform experiments in handwriting recognition to show that our method easily applies to other sequence classification tasks.

Pseudo-Labeling for Massively Multilingual Speech Recognition

Semi-supervised learning through pseudo-labeling has become a staple of state-of-the-art monolingual speech recognition systems. In this work, we extend pseudo-labeling to massively multilingual speech recognition with 60 languages. We propose a simple pseudo-labeling recipe that works well even with low-resource languages: train a supervised multilingual model, fine-tune it with semi-supervised learning on a target language, generate pseudo-labels for that language, and train a final model using pseudo-labels for all languages, either from scratch or by fine-tuning. Experiments on the labeled Common Voice and unlabeled VoxPopuli datasets show that our recipe can yield a model with better performance for many languages that also transfers well to LibriSpeech.

Word Order Does Not Matter For Speech Recognition

In this paper, we study training of automatic speech recognition system in a weakly supervised setting where the order of words in transcript labels of the audio training data is not known. We train a word-level acoustic model which aggregates the distribution of all output frames using LogSumExp operation and uses a cross-entropy loss to match with the ground-truth words distribution. Using the pseudo-labels generated from this model on the training set, we then train a letter-based acoustic model using Connectionist Temporal Classification loss. Our system achieves 2.3%/4.6% on test-clean/test-other subsets of LibriSpeech, which closely matches with the supervised baseline's performance.