RADAR: Rubric-Aware Dependency and Redundancy Analysis for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation

Rubric-based LLM-as-judge pipelines often assume that evaluation criteria provide independent signals. In practice, however, criteria can be behaviorally coupled: improving one criterion may systematically change scores on another, distorting aggregate scores used in model-release or product-update decisions. We introduce RADAR, a lightweight preflight diagnostic framework for estimating such coupling before large-scale evaluation. Given a rubric, RADAR generates targeted synthetic probes, scores each probe on all criteria, and produces a directional coupling matrix that shows which criteria co-score and how. We validate RADAR on three industry-relevant evaluation settings: NVIDIA HelpSteer2, SumPubMed, and the Yale-Salesforce SummEval benchmark. Using only a small number of probes per criterion, RADAR recovers human inter-criterion correlation structure (Pearson r > 0.84) and provides practitioners with concrete audit signals about redundancy, hierarchy, and aggregation sensitivity before committing to large-scale judging.

LEDGER: Scaling Agentic Document Editing with Dependency-aware Graph Retrieval

We introduce LEDGER to tackle the novel context engineering challenge of agentic document editing, where localized edits to long, structured documents must be applied efficiently without breaking cross-references or semantic consistency. LEDGER constructs a lightweight dependency graph that explicitly models document structure, including hierarchical organization, explicit references, implicit dependencies, and semantic relationships. For each edit, graph-guided retrieval selects only the necessary context, avoiding full-document processing while preserving consistency. We evaluate LEDGER on a curated benchmark of 1.9k test cases with various document types and lengths, spanning six state-of-the-art models: LEDGER improves consistency from 56% to 76% across all six models and test scenarios while reducing token usage. Notably, LEDGER with low reasoning effort matches baseline performance at high reasoning effort using fewer tokens, showing that explicit dependency representations can partially substitute for expensive internal reasoning in agentic document editing.