Beyond Representational Similarity: Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain for Generative Plagiarism Detection and Candidate Source Reranking

Large language models (LLMs) pose challenges to academic integrity and peer review. Yet generative plagiarism detection remains an underexplored and largely unresolved challenge. Prior work on LLM-generated-text detection targets AI involvement, which may be permissible, rather than source reuse, while similarity-based methods struggle after extensive rewriting and multi-source synthesis. Motivated by the description-length view of probabilistic prediction, in which relevant side information can reduce a target sequence's code length, we introduce Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain (SCDG), a directional, training-free framework that contrasts a frozen language model's description length of a suspicious document $P$ with and without a candidate source $S$. This contrast yields token-level log-likelihood gains that measure the incremental predictive evidence supplied by $S$. We evaluate SCDG on the PAN at CLEF benchmarks for generative plagiarism. On a PAN 2025-derived pairwise benchmark, SCDG achieves 0.92 Precision, 0.97 Recall, and 0.94 F1, outperforming all baselines; on PAN 2026's multi-source retrieval task, it reaches 0.83 nDCG@10 and 0.96 Recall@100, surpassing all baselines. On a same-topic, same-event Multi-News test, the calibrated gain-distribution SCDG classifier predicts source reuse for only $0.125\%$ of pairs, supporting robustness to topical overlap under this evaluation protocol. These results establish SCDG as a unified and token-decomposable signal for source-specific content reuse under extensive transformation.

Ranking LLMs by compression

We conceptualize the process of understanding as information compression, and propose a method for ranking large language models (LLMs) based on lossless data compression. We demonstrate the equivalence of compression length under arithmetic coding with cumulative negative log probabilities when using a large language model as a prior, that is, the pre-training phase of the model is essentially the process of learning the optimal coding length. At the same time, the evaluation metric compression ratio can be obtained without actual compression, which greatly saves overhead. In this paper, we use five large language models as priors for compression, then compare their performance on challenging natural language processing tasks, including sentence completion, question answering, and coreference resolution. Experimental results show that compression ratio and model performance are positively correlated, so it can be used as a general metric to evaluate large language models.