STQuant: Spatio-Temporal Adaptive Framework for Optimizer Quantization in Large Multimodal Model Training

Quantization is an effective way to reduce the memory cost of large-scale model training. However, most existing methods adopt fixed-precision policies, which ignore the fact that optimizer-state distributions vary significantly across layers and training steps. Such uniform designs often introduce noticeable accuracy degradation. To move beyond fixed quantization, we propose STQuant, a distributed training framework that reduces the memory footprint of optimizer states via dynamic precision allocation across layers, state variables, and training steps, while maintaining model quality. Naively applying dynamic quantization during training is challenging for two reasons. First, optimizer states are numerically sensitive, and quantization noise can destabilize quality. Second, jointly considering multiple states and layers induces a large combinatorial search space. STQuant addresses these challenges with two key techniques: 1) a provably near-optimal factor selection strategy that accurately identifies the most influential factors for precision adaptation. 2) a dynamic transition decision algorithm that reduces the search cost from exponential to linear complexity. Experiments on GPT-2 and ViT show that STQuant reduces optimizer-state memory by 84.4%, achieving an average bit-width of as low as 5.1 bits, compared with existing solutions. Moreover, STQuant incurs only O(N/K) computational overhead and requires O(1) extra space.

CCR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Complex Constraints, Control Flows, and Real-World Cases

Enhancing the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow complex instructions is critical for their deployment in real-world applications. However, existing evaluation methods often oversimplify instruction complexity as a mere additive combination of atomic constraints, failing to adequately capture the high-dimensional complexity arising from the intricate interplay of content and format, logical workflow control, and real-world applications. This leads to a significant gap between current evaluation practices and practical demands. To bridge this gap, we introduce CCR-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to assess LLMs' adherence to complex instructions. CCR-Bench is characterized by: (1) deep entanglement of content and formatting requirements in task specifications; (2) instructions that involve intricate task decomposition, conditional reasoning, and procedural planning; and (3) evaluation samples derived entirely from real-world industrial scenarios. Extensive experiments on CCR-Bench demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models exhibit substantial performance deficiencies, clearly quantifying the gap between current LLM capabilities and the demands of realworld instruction understanding. We believe that CCR-Bench offers a more rigorous and realistic evaluation framework, advancing the development of LLMs toward the next generation of models capable of understanding and executing complex tasks in industrial applications.