On the Generalisation of Koopman Representations for Chaotic System Control

This paper investigates the generalisability of Koopman-based representations for chaotic dynamical systems, focusing on their transferability across prediction and control tasks. Using the Lorenz system as a testbed, we propose a three-stage methodology: learning Koopman embeddings through autoencoding, pre-training a transformer on next-state prediction, and fine-tuning for safety-critical control. Our results show that Koopman embeddings outperform both standard and physics-informed PCA baselines, achieving accurate and data-efficient performance. Notably, fixing the pre-trained transformer weights during fine-tuning leads to no performance degradation, indicating that the learned representations capture reusable dynamical structure rather than task-specific patterns. These findings support the use of Koopman embeddings as a foundation for multi-task learning in physics-informed machine learning. A project page is available at https://kikisprdx.github.io/.

Sparsity-Driven Plasticity in Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning

Plasticity loss, a diminishing capacity to adapt as training progresses, is a critical challenge in deep reinforcement learning. We examine this issue in multi-task reinforcement learning (MTRL), where higher representational flexibility is crucial for managing diverse and potentially conflicting task demands. We systematically explore how sparsification methods, particularly Gradual Magnitude Pruning (GMP) and Sparse Evolutionary Training (SET), enhance plasticity and consequently improve performance in MTRL agents. We evaluate these approaches across distinct MTRL architectures (shared backbone, Mixture of Experts, Mixture of Orthogonal Experts) on standardized MTRL benchmarks, comparing against dense baselines, and a comprehensive range of alternative plasticity-inducing or regularization methods. Our results demonstrate that both GMP and SET effectively mitigate key indicators of plasticity degradation, such as neuron dormancy and representational collapse. These plasticity improvements often correlate with enhanced multi-task performance, with sparse agents frequently outperforming dense counterparts and achieving competitive results against explicit plasticity interventions. Our findings offer insights into the interplay between plasticity, network sparsity, and MTRL designs, highlighting dynamic sparsification as a robust but context-sensitive tool for developing more adaptable MTRL systems.

Fisher-Guided Selective Forgetting: Mitigating The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learning

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) systems often tend to overfit to early experiences, a phenomenon known as the primacy bias (PB). This bias can severely hinder learning efficiency and final performance, particularly in complex environments. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation of PB through the lens of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM). We develop a framework characterizing PB through distinct patterns in the FIM trace, identifying critical memorization and reorganization phases during learning. Building on this understanding, we propose Fisher-Guided Selective Forgetting (FGSF), a novel method that leverages the geometric structure of the parameter space to selectively modify network weights, preventing early experiences from dominating the learning process. Empirical results across DeepMind Control Suite (DMC) environments show that FGSF consistently outperforms baselines, particularly in complex tasks. We analyze the different impacts of PB on actor and critic networks, the role of replay ratios in exacerbating the effect, and the effectiveness of even simple noise injection methods. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of PB and practical mitigation strategies, offering a FIM-based geometric perspective for advancing DRL.

Upside-Down Reinforcement Learning for More Interpretable Optimal Control

Model-Free Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms either learn how to map states to expected rewards or search for policies that can maximize a certain performance function. Model-Based algorithms instead, aim to learn an approximation of the underlying model of the RL environment and then use it in combination with planning algorithms. Upside-Down Reinforcement Learning (UDRL) is a novel learning paradigm that aims to learn how to predict actions from states and desired commands. This task is formulated as a Supervised Learning problem and has successfully been tackled by Neural Networks (NNs). In this paper, we investigate whether function approximation algorithms other than NNs can also be used within a UDRL framework. Our experiments, performed over several popular optimal control benchmarks, show that tree-based methods like Random Forests and Extremely Randomized Trees can perform just as well as NNs with the significant benefit of resulting in policies that are inherently more interpretable than NNs, therefore paving the way for more transparent, safe, and robust RL.

Smaller Batches, Bigger Gains? Investigating the Impact of Batch Sizes on Reinforcement Learning Based Real-World Production Scheduling

Production scheduling is an essential task in manufacturing, with Reinforcement Learning (RL) emerging as a key solution. In a previous work, RL was utilized to solve an extended permutation flow shop scheduling problem (PFSSP) for a real-world production line with two stages, linked by a central buffer. The RL agent was trained to sequence equallysized product batches to minimize setup efforts and idle times. However, the substantial impact caused by varying the size of these product batches has not yet been explored. In this follow-up study, we investigate the effects of varying batch sizes, exploring both the quality of solutions and the training dynamics of the RL agent. The results demonstrate that it is possible to methodically identify reasonable boundaries for the batch size. These boundaries are determined on one side by the increasing sample complexity associated with smaller batch sizes, and on the other side by the decreasing flexibility of the agent when dealing with larger batch sizes. This provides the practitioner the ability to make an informed decision regarding the selection of an appropriate batch size. Moreover, we introduce and investigate two new curriculum learning strategies to enable the training with small batch sizes. The findings of this work offer the potential for application in several industrial use cases with comparable scheduling problems.

$ε$-Optimally Solving Zero-Sum POSGs

A recent method for solving zero-sum partially observable stochastic games (zs-POSGs) embeds the original game into a new one called the occupancy Markov game. This reformulation allows applying Bellman's principle of optimality to solve zs-POSGs. However, improving a current solution requires solving a linear program with exponentially many potential constraints, which significantly restricts the scalability of this approach. This paper exploits the optimal value function's novel uniform continuity properties to overcome this limitation. We first construct a new operator that is computationally more efficient than the state-of-the-art update rules without compromising optimality. In particular, improving a current solution now involves a linear program with an exponential drop in constraints. We then also show that point-based value iteration algorithms utilizing our findings improve the scalability of existing methods while maintaining guarantees in various domains.

VDSC: Enhancing Exploration Timing with Value Discrepancy and State Counts

Despite the considerable attention given to the questions of \textit{how much} and \textit{how to} explore in deep reinforcement learning, the investigation into \textit{when} to explore remains relatively less researched. While more sophisticated exploration strategies can excel in specific, often sparse reward environments, existing simpler approaches, such as $\epsilon$-greedy, persist in outperforming them across a broader spectrum of domains. The appeal of these simpler strategies lies in their ease of implementation and generality across a wide range of domains. The downside is that these methods are essentially a blind switching mechanism, which completely disregards the agent's internal state. In this paper, we propose to leverage the agent's internal state to decide \textit{when} to explore, addressing the shortcomings of blind switching mechanisms. We present Value Discrepancy and State Counts through homeostasis (VDSC), a novel approach for efficient exploration timing. Experimental results on the Atari suite demonstrate the superiority of our strategy over traditional methods such as $\epsilon$-greedy and Boltzmann, as well as more sophisticated techniques like Noisy Nets.

Mapping Transformer Leveraged Embeddings for Cross-Lingual Document Representation

Recommendation systems, for documents, have become tools to find relevant content on the Web. However, these systems have limitations when it comes to recommending documents in languages different from the query language, which means they might overlook resources in non-native languages. This research focuses on representing documents across languages by using Transformer Leveraged Document Representations (TLDRs) that are mapped to a cross-lingual domain. Four multilingual pre-trained transformer models (mBERT, mT5 XLM RoBERTa, ErnieM) were evaluated using three mapping methods across 20 language pairs representing combinations of five selected languages of the European Union. Metrics like Mate Retrieval Rate and Reciprocal Rank were used to measure the effectiveness of mapped TLDRs compared to non-mapped ones. The results highlight the power of cross-lingual representations achieved through pre-trained transformers and mapping approaches suggesting a promising direction for expanding beyond language connections, between two specific languages.

Bridging the Reality Gap of Reinforcement Learning based Traffic Signal Control using Domain Randomization and Meta Learning

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has been widely explored in Traffic Signal Control (TSC) applications, however, still no such system has been deployed in practice. A key barrier to progress in this area is the reality gap, the discrepancy that results from differences between simulation models and their real-world equivalents. In this paper, we address this challenge by first presenting a comprehensive analysis of potential simulation parameters that contribute to this reality gap. We then also examine two promising strategies that can bridge this gap: Domain Randomization (DR) and Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML). Both strategies were trained with a traffic simulation model of an intersection. In addition, the model was embedded in LemgoRL, a framework that integrates realistic, safety-critical requirements into the control system. Subsequently, we evaluated the performance of the two methods on a separate model of the same intersection that was developed with a different traffic simulator. In this way, we mimic the reality gap. Our experimental results show that both DR and MAML outperform a state-of-the-art RL algorithm, therefore highlighting their potential to mitigate the reality gap in RLbased TSC systems.

Learning Perceptive Bipedal Locomotion over Irregular Terrain

In this paper we propose a novel bipedal locomotion controller that uses noisy exteroception to traverse a wide variety of terrains. Building on the cutting-edge advancements in attention based belief encoding for quadrupedal locomotion, our work extends these methods to the bipedal domain, resulting in a robust and reliable internal belief of the terrain ahead despite noisy sensor inputs. Additionally, we present a reward function that allows the controller to successfully traverse irregular terrain. We compare our method with a proprioceptive baseline and show that our method is able to traverse a wide variety of terrains and greatly outperforms the state-of-the-art in terms of robustness, speed and efficiency.