EFLUX: Elastic Multi-Robot Formation Navigation and Adaptation with Agentic LLMs

Multi-robot teams operating in confined or cluttered environments must adapt both their formation geometry and group topology to navigate through complex obstacles. This adaptation requires two complementary behaviors: deformation, where the team continuously reshapes its geometry while remaining connected, and reconfiguration, where robots split into subgroups or merge back into a single formation. Existing methods often model these behaviors independently, connect them through handcrafted rules, or lack explicit geometric criteria for determining when each behavior should be invoked. However, challenging environments may require online changes in formation shape, connectivity, and effective team composition, making decoupled or rule-based approaches prone to suboptimal trajectories and deadlock. We propose EFLUX, a geometry-grounded LLM agentic framework for automatic and elastic multi-robot formation navigation. EFLUX extracts a structured scene representation and uses an LLM to reason jointly over both deformation actions, such as scaling and shearing, and reconfiguration actions, such as splitting and merging. These strategies are then translated into executable per-robot waypoints through a closed-loop generation, verification, and correction pipeline. Simulation and hardware experiments show that EFLUX enables safe, continuous, and elastic formation navigation in constrained environments, reducing deadlock and navigation failures compared with baselines while maintaining coherent multi-robot coordination.

REBAR: Reference Ethical Benchmark for Autonomy Readiness

As autonomous systems grow more advanced, objective metrics to evaluate their ethical and legal compliance are critical for informing end users of their limitations and ensuring accountability of those who misuse them. Current ethical embodied AI frameworks remain mostly qualitative, focusing on system design (through safety guardrails or targeted red teaming), and the realized guardrails often directly disallow unsafe behavior without providing the user with an override or interpretable reason. Instead, there is a need for computable metrics through rigorous testing that allow a user to determine the applicability of the system to the task. To address this gap, we introduce the Reference Ethical Benchmark for Autonomy Readiness (REBAR), a quantitative test and evaluation framework for autonomous systems. REBAR maps operating metrics into a computable Autonomy Readiness Level (ARL) rubric that can quantify ethical performance. Key innovations of the framework include a neuro-symbolic Large Language Model (LLM) approach to calculate and explain the ethical difficulty of scenarios, LLM-driven at-scale generation of test instances, and a versatile, photorealistic simulation environment. By evaluating white-box autonomy solutions through this rigorous testing pipeline, REBAR delivers an objective and repeatable benchmark score, bridging the gap between abstract principles and verifiable, accountable autonomy.