Abstract:Although recent robot perception research emphasizes training on data from diverse environments to improve generalization, most existing methods still rely on centralized learning, which is inefficient and difficult to scale across heterogeneous robot platforms. Federated learning (FL) offers an alternative by enabling distributed training without raw data transfer, but it suffers from severe performance degradation under domain shifts caused by heterogeneity across clients. In real robotic deployments, data distributions often overlap across platforms, environments, and sensing conditions, making it difficult to partition clients into clearly separated domains. However, this characteristic breaks the assumption of clearly separable client domains commonly used in clustered FL. To address this gap in robot perception, particularly in depth estimation, we introduce two realistic and unexplored non-IID scenarios that reflect heterogeneity in terms of platform, environment, and depth distribution. We then propose FeDepth, a descriptor-based clustered FL framework that models client relationships through soft clustering. Unlike hard clustering methods that assume clearly separated clusters, FeDepth allows clients to participate in multiple clusters, capturing continuous and ambiguous domain transitions commonly observed in robotic environments. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FeDepth consistently improves robustness over standard FL and clustered FL baselines across multiple depth estimation architectures, providing a practical and effective solution for federated robot perception. Our project page is available at https://vision3d-lab.github.io/fedepth/.
Abstract:Decision trees generate interpretable if--then rules, yet they contain irrelevant conditions (IRCs). These IRCs arise from the structural mechanism of tree splitting and persist even in modern optimal sparse tree induction algorithms. Existing IRC deletion methods overlook this structural mechanism; therefore, they either preserve the original tree too loosely to remain reliable, or too strictly to achieve meaningful simplification. This study provides theoretical foundations for reliable IRC deletion by establishing theorems and propositions related to the underlying IRC mechanism. The key finding is that a binary split shifts class proportions in opposite directions relative to the parent. Specifically, an increase in the class-1 proportion along one branch necessitates an increase in the class-0 proportion along its sibling, thereby generating a C1-link and a C0-link. Based on this structural fact, we propose a structural IRC deletion framework. Relative to each leaf, links that increase the leaf-class proportion are matched, whereas links that increase the proportion of the opposite leaf-class are mismatched. These mismatched links are flagged as structurally suspicious IRC candidates. Rather than deleting them outright, the framework rigorously diagnoses their relevance by assessing prediction reliability. It selectively deletes conditions that are structurally and empirically irrelevant, while strictly protecting those whose deletion would reduce the rule's reliability. Experimental results confirm that the proposed framework achieves substantial rule simplification without sacrificing the reliability of the original tree.