Revealing Interpretable Failure Modes of VLMs

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used in safety-critical applications because of their broad reasoning capabilities and ability to generalize with minimal task-specific engineering. Despite these advantages, they can exhibit catastrophic failures in specific real-world situations, constituting failure modes. We introduce REVELIO, a framework for systematically uncovering interpretable failure modes in VLMs. We define a failure mode as a composition of interpretable, domain-relevant concepts-such as pedestrian proximity or adverse weather conditions-under which a target VLM consistently behaves incorrectly. Identifying such failures requires searching over an exponentially large discrete combinatorial space. To address this challenge, REVELIO combines two search procedures: a diversity-aware beam search that efficiently maps the failure landscape, and a Gaussian-process Thompson Sampling strategy that enables broader exploration of complex failure modes. We apply REVELIO to autonomous driving and indoor robotics domains, uncovering previously unreported vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art VLMs. In driving environments, the models often demonstrate weak spatial grounding and fail to account for major obstructions, leading to recommendations that would result in simulated crashes. In indoor robotics tasks, VLMs either miss safety hazards or behave excessively conservatively, producing false alarms and reducing operational efficiency. By identifying structured and interpretable failure modes, REVELIO offers actionable insights that can support targeted VLM safety improvements.

Specification Generation for Neural Networks in Systems

Specifications - precise mathematical representations of correct domain-specific behaviors - are crucial to guarantee the trustworthiness of computer systems. With the increasing development of neural networks as computer system components, specifications gain more importance as they can be used to regulate the behaviors of these black-box models. Traditionally, specifications are designed by domain experts based on their intuition of correct behavior. However, this is labor-intensive and hence not a scalable approach as computer system applications diversify. We hypothesize that the traditional (aka reference) algorithms that neural networks replace for higher performance can act as effective proxies for correct behaviors of the models, when available. This is because they have been used and tested for long enough to encode several aspects of the trustworthy/correct behaviors in the underlying domain. Driven by our hypothesis, we develop a novel automated framework, SpecTRA to generate specifications for neural networks using references. We formulate specification generation as an optimization problem and solve it with observations of reference behaviors. SpecTRA clusters similar observations into compact specifications. We present specifications generated by SpecTRA for neural networks in adaptive bit rate and congestion control algorithms. Our specifications show evidence of being correct and matching intuition. Moreover, we use our specifications to show several unknown vulnerabilities of the SOTA models for computer systems.

Quantitative Certification of Bias in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) can produce responses that exhibit social biases and support stereotypes. However, conventional benchmarking is insufficient to thoroughly evaluate LLM bias, as it can not scale to large sets of prompts and provides no guarantees. Therefore, we propose a novel certification framework QuaCer-B (Quantitative Certification of Bias) that provides formal guarantees on obtaining unbiased responses from target LLMs under large sets of prompts. A certificate consists of high-confidence bounds on the probability of obtaining biased responses from the LLM for any set of prompts containing sensitive attributes, sampled from a distribution. We illustrate the bias certification in LLMs for prompts with various prefixes drawn from given distributions. We consider distributions of random token sequences, mixtures of manual jailbreaks, and jailbreaks in the LLM's embedding space to certify its bias. We certify popular LLMs with QuaCer-B and present novel insights into their biases.

QuaCer-C: Quantitative Certification of Knowledge Comprehension in LLMs

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on several benchmarks. However, traditional studies do not provide formal guarantees on the performance of LLMs. In this work, we propose a novel certification framework for LLM, QuaCer-C, wherein we formally certify the knowledge-comprehension capabilities of popular LLMs. Our certificates are quantitative - they consist of high-confidence, tight bounds on the probability that the target LLM gives the correct answer on any relevant knowledge comprehension prompt. Our certificates for the Llama, Vicuna, and Mistral LLMs indicate that the knowledge comprehension capability improves with an increase in the number of parameters and that the Mistral model is less performant than the rest in this evaluation.

Bypassing the Safety Training of Open-Source LLMs with Priming Attacks

With the recent surge in popularity of LLMs has come an ever-increasing need for LLM safety training. In this paper, we show that SOTA open-source LLMs are vulnerable to simple, optimization-free attacks we refer to as $\textit{priming attacks}$, which are easy to execute and effectively bypass alignment from safety training. Our proposed attack improves the Attack Success Rate on Harmful Behaviors, as measured by Llama Guard, by up to $3.3\times$ compared to baselines. Source code and data are available at https://github.com/uiuc-focal-lab/llm-priming-attacks .

CoMEt: x86 Cost Model Explanation Framework

ML-based program cost models have been shown to yield highly accurate predictions. They have the capability to replace heavily-engineered analytical program cost models in mainstream compilers, but their black-box nature discourages their adoption. In this work, we propose the first method for obtaining faithful and intuitive explanations for the throughput predictions made by ML-based cost models. We demonstrate our explanations for the state-of-the-art ML-based cost model, Ithemal. We compare the explanations for Ithemal with the explanations for a hand-crafted, accurate analytical model, uiCA. Our empirical findings show that high similarity between explanations for Ithemal and uiCA usually corresponds to high similarity between their predictions.