GAINS: Leveraging Inconsistent Human Intervention Signals in Reinforcement Learning

Correcting robot manipulation policies through human intervention holds great promise for real-world deployment, yet human operators are inherently imperfect in both the actions they provide and the timing of their intervention signals. While the former has been extensively discussed in reinforcement learning (RL), the latter remains underexplored. At high control frequencies, human intervention signals are often delayed and inconsistent across time and state space. In this work, we present GAINS, a framework for leveraging inconsistent human intervention signals in RL. At the core of GAINS, we employ distributional RL with quantile Q-networks to model the return variability induced by sparse task rewards and inconsistent human interventions. Building on this distributional representation, we introduce a pessimistic exploration strategy that promotes safe and sample-efficient learning under human corrections. We evaluate GAINS on four diverse simulated manipulation tasks and two challenging real-world scenarios against state-of-the-art intervention-based methods. GAINS achieves a 22% higher task success rate than RLIF and improves recovery success by up to 43% in failure scenarios. These results highlight the importance of modeling return variability induced by human imperfection for real-world deployment of intervention-based learning.

Real-world Reinforcement Learning from Suboptimal Interventions

Real-world reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising approach to training precise and dexterous robotic manipulation policies in an online manner, enabling robots to learn from their own experience while gradually reducing human labor. However, prior real-world RL methods often assume that human interventions are optimal across the entire state space, overlooking the fact that even expert operators cannot consistently provide optimal actions in all states or completely avoid mistakes. Indiscriminately mixing intervention data with robot-collected data inherits the sample inefficiency of RL, while purely imitating intervention data can ultimately degrade the final performance achievable by RL. The question of how to leverage potentially suboptimal and noisy human interventions to accelerate learning without being constrained by them thus remains open. To address this challenge, we propose SiLRI, a state-wise Lagrangian reinforcement learning algorithm for real-world robot manipulation tasks. Specifically, we formulate the online manipulation problem as a constrained RL optimization, where the constraint bound at each state is determined by the uncertainty of human interventions. We then introduce a state-wise Lagrange multiplier and solve the problem via a min-max optimization, jointly optimizing the policy and the Lagrange multiplier to reach a saddle point. Built upon a human-as-copilot teleoperation system, our algorithm is evaluated through real-world experiments on diverse manipulation tasks. Experimental results show that SiLRI effectively exploits human suboptimal interventions, reducing the time required to reach a 90% success rate by at least 50% compared with the state-of-the-art RL method HIL-SERL, and achieving a 100% success rate on long-horizon manipulation tasks where other RL methods struggle to succeed. Project website: https://silri-rl.github.io/.