From `May' to `Is': Certainty Distortion in Language Model Rewriting

Humans increasingly turn to Language Models (LMs) in ways that shape beliefs and drive decisions, including discussing, rewriting, and summarizing information from scientific articles, news, and medical reports. However, in these domains, where how confidently a claim is expressed matters, little is known about whether LMs faithfully preserve it. In this work, we investigate certainty distortion in LMs, defined as meaningful changes in expressed certainty when semantic content is preserved. We propose an LM-based evaluation metric that is consistent with population-level judgments of certainty. Using this metric, we characterize certainty distortion across different sizes and families of models in the context of scientific and medical communication tasks. Our results show that certainty distortion affects up to 75\% of LM outputs and is systematically asymmetric in rewriting tasks with most LMs being 1.5-2$\times$ more likely to increase the expressed certainty than to decrease it. These effects can compound over repeated paraphrasing: in the medical domain, claude-haiku-4-5 increases certainty of 20\% examples after a single iteration, increasing to 40\% after five iterations. Prompt-based interventions reduce overall certainty distortion but do not eliminate it. Together, these findings reveal a general bias toward inflating expressed certainty, with direct implications for users who rely on LMs in high-stakes domains.

The Impact of AI Usage and Informativeness on Skill Development in Logical Reasoning

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly integrated into human problem-solving, yet its effects on individual skill development remain unclear. We examine how both AI usage and informativeness can shape learning in the context of a controlled logical reasoning task with on-demand access to AI assistance. We find that greater AI usage is associated with weaker skill development: heavy AI users underperform relative to comparable peers, whereas light AI users perform similarly to matched users who do not use AI. We also find in our study that these patterns are mediated by AI informativeness. Low-information AI neither improves immediate performance nor preserves performance after AI assistance is removed, and is linked to weaker learning overall. On the other hand, high-information AI was found to improve short-run performance without reducing post-AI outcomes on average in our experiments, but with heterogeneous effects. Our findings in general suggest that AI can, depending on context, either complement human skill development by amplifying independent reasoning or can act as a substitute that undermines such reasoning, with the implication that regulating AI access and usage will be important for promoting skill development in the presence of AI assistance.

Macro Graph of Experts for Billion-Scale Multi-Task Recommendation

Graph-based multi-task learning at billion-scale presents a significant challenge, as different tasks correspond to distinct billion-scale graphs. Traditional multi-task learning methods often neglect these graph structures, relying solely on individual user and item embeddings. However, disregarding graph structures overlooks substantial potential for improving performance. In this paper, we introduce the Macro Graph of Expert (MGOE) framework, the first approach capable of leveraging macro graph embeddings to capture task-specific macro features while modeling the correlations between task-specific experts. Specifically, we propose the concept of a Macro Graph Bottom, which, for the first time, enables multi-task learning models to incorporate graph information effectively. We design the Macro Prediction Tower to dynamically integrate macro knowledge across tasks. MGOE has been deployed at scale, powering multi-task learning for the homepage of a leading billion-scale recommender system. Extensive offline experiments conducted on three public benchmark datasets demonstrate its superiority over state-of-the-art multi-task learning methods, establishing MGOE as a breakthrough in multi-task graph-based recommendation. Furthermore, online A/B tests confirm the superiority of MGOE in billion-scale recommender systems.

Graph Representation Learning via Contrasting Cluster Assignments

With the rise of contrastive learning, unsupervised graph representation learning has been booming recently, even surpassing the supervised counterparts in some machine learning tasks. Most of existing contrastive models for graph representation learning either focus on maximizing mutual information between local and global embeddings, or primarily depend on contrasting embeddings at node level. However, they are still not exquisite enough to comprehensively explore the local and global views of network topology. Although the former considers local-global relationship, its coarse global information leads to grudging cooperation between local and global views. The latter pays attention to node-level feature alignment, so that the role of global view appears inconspicuous. To avoid falling into these two extreme cases, we propose a novel unsupervised graph representation model by contrasting cluster assignments, called as GRCCA. It is motivated to make good use of local and global information synthetically through combining clustering algorithms and contrastive learning. This not only facilitates the contrastive effect, but also provides the more high-quality graph information. Meanwhile, GRCCA further excavates cluster-level information, which make it get insight to the elusive association between nodes beyond graph topology. Specifically, we first generate two augmented graphs with distinct graph augmentation strategies, then employ clustering algorithms to obtain their cluster assignments and prototypes respectively. The proposed GRCCA further compels the identical nodes from different augmented graphs to recognize their cluster assignments mutually by minimizing a cross entropy loss. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we compare with the state-of-the-art models in three different downstream tasks. The experimental results show that GRCCA has strong competitiveness in most tasks.