Multi-dimensional training-priority weighting based on physical information propagation paths: a unified residual-weighting framework for physics-informed neural networks

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have shown promise for solving partial differential equations (PDEs); however, their synchronous optimization treats residuals of different regions and constraints equally, which is inconsistent with the progressive "from source to response" physical information propagation path, degrading training stability and accuracy. Existing causal training methods focus mainly on the temporal dimension, lacking a unified characterization of spatial and boundary dimensions. To address this, we define a unified class of training priorities according to the physical information propagation path: premise regions should be learned before dependent regions; temporal, spatial, and boundary priorities are instances of this principle. Using neural tangent kernel (NTK) dynamics, we theoretically analyze why standard PINNs do not obey this priority: their residual convergence order is governed by the NTK spectrum and is independent of the propagation path. Accordingly, we propose a unified multi-dimensional priority-constraint framework that partitions the domain along the propagation path and constructs negative-exponential residual weights, converting the physical propagation order into a training priority. For cases with coexisting priorities, we introduce a directional compatibility coefficient to clarify that "orthogonal directions can be coupled multiplicatively in synergy, whereas coaxial opposite directions cannot." Benchmark cases show that this method consistently improves the convergence behavior and prediction accuracy of PINNs on problems with clear propagation paths or constraint-dominated structures, without modifying the network architecture and with controllable additional computational cost.

Over-PINNs: Enhancing Physics-Informed Neural Networks via Higher-Order Partial Derivative Overdetermination of PDEs

Partial differential equations (PDEs) serve as the cornerstone of mathematical physics. In recent years, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have significantly reduced the dependence on large datasets by embedding physical laws directly into the training of neural networks. However, when dealing with complex problems, the accuracy of PINNs still has room for improvement. To address this issue, we introduce the Over-PINNs framework, which leverages automatic differentiation (AD) to generate higher-order auxiliary equations that impose additional physical constraints. These equations are incorporated as extra loss terms in the training process, effectively enhancing the model's ability to capture physical information through an "overdetermined" approach. Numerical results illustrate that this method exhibits strong versatility in solving various types of PDEs. It achieves a significant improvement in solution accuracy without incurring substantial additional computational costs.

Benchmark of Segmentation Techniques for Pelvic Fracture in CT and X-ray: Summary of the PENGWIN 2024 Challenge

The segmentation of pelvic fracture fragments in CT and X-ray images is crucial for trauma diagnosis, surgical planning, and intraoperative guidance. However, accurately and efficiently delineating the bone fragments remains a significant challenge due to complex anatomy and imaging limitations. The PENGWIN challenge, organized as a MICCAI 2024 satellite event, aimed to advance automated fracture segmentation by benchmarking state-of-the-art algorithms on these complex tasks. A diverse dataset of 150 CT scans was collected from multiple clinical centers, and a large set of simulated X-ray images was generated using the DeepDRR method. Final submissions from 16 teams worldwide were evaluated under a rigorous multi-metric testing scheme. The top-performing CT algorithm achieved an average fragment-wise intersection over union (IoU) of 0.930, demonstrating satisfactory accuracy. However, in the X-ray task, the best algorithm attained an IoU of 0.774, highlighting the greater challenges posed by overlapping anatomical structures. Beyond the quantitative evaluation, the challenge revealed methodological diversity in algorithm design. Variations in instance representation, such as primary-secondary classification versus boundary-core separation, led to differing segmentation strategies. Despite promising results, the challenge also exposed inherent uncertainties in fragment definition, particularly in cases of incomplete fractures. These findings suggest that interactive segmentation approaches, integrating human decision-making with task-relevant information, may be essential for improving model reliability and clinical applicability.