Beyond VMAF: Towards Application-Specific Metrics for Teleoperation Video

Automated driving has made remarkable progress, yet situations still arise where human intervention is necessary. Teleoperation provides a scalable solution to address such cases, enabling remote operators to support vehicles without being physically present. In this context, video transmission forms the operator's primary source of situational awareness, making video quality a decisive factor for both safety and task performance. In an online study, participants rated compressed video sequences from the Zenseact Dataset and provided subjective quality ratings. These ratings were then used to retrain the Video Multi-Method Assessment Fusion (VMAF) model, yielding an adapted variant tailored to teleoperation. The retrained model demonstrated improved alignment with human ratings compared to the original 4K VMAF. In particular, RMSE decreased from 10.36 to 8.83, and MAD from 8.71 to 6.38, corresponding to improvements of 15% and 27%, respectively. These results highlight that incorporating domain-specific data can enhance the predictive power of established quality metrics in safety-critical applications. At the same time, Outlier cases emerged in which videos received high objective scores despite noticeable degradations in regions critical for the driving task.

Belief-Space Residual Risk for Automated Driving under Localization Uncertainty

Residual risk metrics have recently been introduced to assess the safety implications of automated driving systems. Existing approaches typically assume a deterministic ego pose and concentrate mainly on perception errors related to surrounding objects and latency effects. In practice, however, automated vehicles operate under considerable localization uncertainty, especially in complex urban settings and in adverse weather conditions. This work extends the spatial residual risk formulation to the belief space by explicitly modeling ego pose uncertainty as a Gaussian distribution. Residual risk is reformulated as the expected degradation-induced risk over the ego pose belief distribution. Within a particle-based risk estimation framework, localization uncertainty is incorporated into the computation of collision probabilities through covariance fusion of ego and object uncertainties.

vEDGAR -- Can CARLA Do HiL?

Simulation offers advantages throughout the development process of automated driving functions, both in research and product development. Common open-source simulators like CARLA are extensively used in training, evaluation, and software-in-the-loop testing of new automated driving algorithms. However, the CARLA simulator lacks an evaluation where research and automated driving vehicles are simulated with their entire sensor and actuation stack in real time. The goal of this work is therefore to create a simulation framework for testing the automation software on its dedicated hardware and identifying its limits. Achieving this goal would greatly benefit the open-source development workflow of automated driving functions, designating CARLA as a consistent evaluation tool along the entire development process. To achieve this goal, in a first step, requirements are derived, and a simulation architecture is specified and implemented. Based on the formulated requirements, the proposed vEDGAR software is evaluated, resulting in a final conclusion on the applicability of CARLA for HiL testing of automated vehicles. The tool is available open source: Modified CARLA fork: https://github.com/TUMFTM/carla, vEDGAR Framework: https://github.com/TUMFTM/vEDGAR

Human-Aided Trajectory Planning for Automated Vehicles through Teleoperation and Arbitration Graphs

Teleoperation enables remote human support of automated vehicles in scenarios where the automation is not able to find an appropriate solution. Remote assistance concepts, where operators provide discrete inputs to aid specific automation modules like planning, is gaining interest due to its reduced workload on the human remote operator and improved safety. However, these concepts are challenging to implement and maintain due to their deep integration and interaction with the automated driving system. In this paper, we propose a solution to facilitate the implementation of remote assistance concepts that intervene on planning level and extend the operational design domain of the vehicle at runtime. Using arbitration graphs, a modular decision-making framework, we integrate remote assistance into an existing automated driving system without modifying the original software components. Our simulative implementation demonstrates this approach in two use cases, allowing operators to adjust planner constraints and enable trajectory generation beyond nominal operational design domains.

Integrating End-to-End and Modular Driving Approaches for Online Corner Case Detection in Autonomous Driving

Online corner case detection is crucial for ensuring safety in autonomous driving vehicles. Current autonomous driving approaches can be categorized into modular approaches and end-to-end approaches. To leverage the advantages of both, we propose a method for online corner case detection that integrates an end-to-end approach into a modular system. The modular system takes over the primary driving task and the end-to-end network runs in parallel as a secondary one, the disagreement between the systems is then used for corner case detection. We implement this method on a real vehicle and evaluate it qualitatively. Our results demonstrate that end-to-end networks, known for their superior situational awareness, as secondary driving systems, can effectively contribute to corner case detection. These findings suggest that such an approach holds potential for enhancing the safety of autonomous vehicles.

How to Drive -- An Ability-based Description of Autonomous, Remote and Human Driving

The development of autonomous and remote-operated driving systems requires extensive stakeholder analyses, requirement engineering, and formalized system descriptions. This is necessary to guarantee the success of the final product after the expensive and time-consuming development phase. To integrate a formalized description of the required abilites of the system, ability graphs have been proposed in the literature. Up to this date, however, this ability graph has only been used to model less complicated driver assistance systems in the literature. This work aims to introduce the value of an ability graph-based description of complex driving systems. This is achieved by successfully demonstrating and discussing a method for constructing a holistic ability graph capable of describing the entirety of abilities required for any driving system.

Should Teleoperation Be like Driving in a Car? Comparison of Teleoperation HMIs

Since Automated Driving Systems are not expected to operate flawlessly, Automated Vehicles will require human assistance in certain situations. For this reason, teleoperation offers the opportunity for a human to be remotely connected to the vehicle and assist it. The Remote Operator can provide extensive support by directly controlling the vehicle, eliminating the need for Automated Driving functions. However, due to the physical disconnection to the vehicle, monitoring and controlling is challenging compared to driving in the vehicle. Therefore, this work follows the approach of simplifying the task for the Remote Operator by separating the path and velocity input. In a study using a miniature vehicle, different operator-vehicle interactions and input devices were compared based on collisions, task completion time, usability and workload. The evaluation revealed significant differences between the three implemented prototypes using a steering wheel, mouse and keyboard or a touchscreen. The separate input of path and velocity via mouse and keyboard or touchscreen is preferred but is slower compared to parallel input via steering wheel.

Evaluation of Teleoperation Concepts to solve Automated Vehicle Disengagements

Teleoperation is a popular solution to remotely support highly automated vehicles through a human remote operator whenever a disengagement of the automated driving system is present. The remote operator wirelessly connects to the vehicle and solves the disengagement through support or substitution of automated driving functions and therefore enables the vehicle to resume automation. There are different approaches to support automated driving functions on various levels, commonly known as teleoperation concepts. A variety of teleoperation concepts is described in the literature, yet there has been no comprehensive and structured comparison of these concepts, and it is not clear what subset of teleoperation concepts is suitable to enable safe and efficient remote support of highly automated vehicles in a broad spectrum of disengagements. The following work establishes a basis for comparing teleoperation concepts through a literature overview on automated vehicle disengagements and on already conducted studies on the comparison of teleoperation concepts and metrics used to evaluate teleoperation performance. An evaluation of the teleoperation concepts is carried out in an expert workshop, comparing different teleoperation concepts using a selection of automated vehicle disengagement scenarios and metrics. Based on the workshop results, a set of teleoperation concepts is derived that can be used to address a wide variety of automated vehicle disengagements in a safe and efficient way.

CARLA-Autoware-Bridge: Facilitating Autonomous Driving Research with a Unified Framework for Simulation and Module Development

Extensive testing is necessary to ensure the safety of autonomous driving modules. In addition to component tests, the safety assessment of individual modules also requires a holistic view at system level, which can be carried out efficiently with the help of simulation. Achieving seamless compatibility between a modular software stack and simulation is complex and poses a significant challenge for many researchers. To ensure testing at the system level with state-of-the-art AV software and simulation software, we have developed and analyzed a bridge connecting the CARLA simulator with the AV software Autoware Core/Universe. This publicly available bridge enables researchers to easily test their modules within the overall software. Our investigations show that an efficient and reliable communication system has been established. We provide the simulation bridge as open-source software at https://github.com/TUMFTM/Carla-Autoware-Bridge

Trajectory Guidance: Enhanced Remote Driving of highly-automated Vehicles

Despite the rapid technological progress, autonomous vehicles still face a wide range of complex driving situations that require human intervention. Teleoperation technology offers a versatile and effective way to address these challenges. The following work puts existing ideas into a modern context and introduces a novel technical implementation of the trajectory guidance teleoperation concept. The presented system was developed within a high-fidelity simulation environment and experimentally validated, demonstrating a realistic ride-hailing mission with prototype autonomous vehicles and onboard passengers. The results indicate that the proposed concept can be a viable alternative to the existing remote driving options, offering a promising way to enhance teleoperation technology and improve overall operation safety.