ThermoNeRF: Multimodal Neural Radiance Fields for Thermal Novel View Synthesis

Thermal scene reconstruction exhibit great potential for applications across a broad spectrum of fields, including building energy consumption analysis and non-destructive testing. However, existing methods typically require dense scene measurements and often rely on RGB images for 3D geometry reconstruction, with thermal information being projected post-reconstruction. This two-step strategy, adopted due to the lack of texture in thermal images, can lead to disparities between the geometry and temperatures of the reconstructed objects and those of the actual scene. To address this challenge, we propose ThermoNeRF, a novel multimodal approach based on Neural Radiance Fields, capable of rendering new RGB and thermal views of a scene jointly. To overcome the lack of texture in thermal images, we use paired RGB and thermal images to learn scene density, while distinct networks estimate color and temperature information. Furthermore, we introduce ThermoScenes, a new dataset to palliate the lack of available RGB+thermal datasets for scene reconstruction. Experimental results validate that ThermoNeRF achieves accurate thermal image synthesis, with an average mean absolute error of 1.5$^\circ$C, an improvement of over 50% compared to using concatenated RGB+thermal data with Nerfacto, a state-of-the-art NeRF method.

Uncertainty-Guided Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Regression

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Regression (UDAR) aims to adapt a model from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain for regression tasks. Recent successful works in UDAR mostly focus on subspace alignment, involving the alignment of a selected subspace within the entire feature space. This contrasts with the feature alignment methods used for classification, which aim at aligning the entire feature space and have proven effective but are less so in regression settings. Specifically, while classification aims to identify separate clusters across the entire embedding dimension, regression induces less structure in the data representation, necessitating additional guidance for efficient alignment. In this paper, we propose an effective method for UDAR by incorporating guidance from uncertainty. Our approach serves a dual purpose: providing a measure of confidence in predictions and acting as a regularization of the embedding space. Specifically, we leverage the Deep Evidential Learning framework, which outputs both predictions and uncertainties for each input sample. We propose aligning the parameters of higher-order evidential distributions between the source and target domains using traditional alignment methods at the feature or posterior level. Additionally, we propose to augment the feature space representation by mixing source samples with pseudo-labeled target samples based on label similarity. This cross-domain mixing strategy produces more realistic samples than random mixing and introduces higher uncertainty, facilitating further alignment. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on four benchmarks for UDAR, on which we outperform existing methods.

Calibrated Adaptive Teacher for Domain Adaptive Intelligent Fault Diagnosis

Intelligent Fault Diagnosis (IFD) based on deep learning has proven to be an effective and flexible solution, attracting extensive research. Deep neural networks can learn rich representations from vast amounts of representative labeled data for various applications. In IFD, they achieve high classification performance from signals in an end-to-end manner, without requiring extensive domain knowledge. However, deep learning models usually only perform well on the data distribution they have been trained on. When applied to a different distribution, they may experience performance drops. This is also observed in IFD, where assets are often operated in working conditions different from those in which labeled data have been collected. Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) deals with the scenario where labeled data are available in a source domain, and only unlabeled data are available in a target domain, where domains may correspond to operating conditions. Recent methods rely on training with confident pseudo-labels for target samples. However, the confidence-based selection of pseudo-labels is hindered by poorly calibrated confidence estimates in the target domain, primarily due to over-confident predictions, which limits the quality of pseudo-labels and leads to error accumulation. In this paper, we propose a novel UDA method called Calibrated Adaptive Teacher (CAT), where we propose to calibrate the predictions of the teacher network throughout the self-training process, leveraging post-hoc calibration techniques. We evaluate CAT on domain-adaptive IFD and perform extensive experiments on the Paderborn benchmark for bearing fault diagnosis under varying operating conditions. Our proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on most transfer tasks.

From Classification to Segmentation with Explainable AI: A Study on Crack Detection and Growth Monitoring

Monitoring surface cracks in infrastructure is crucial for structural health monitoring. Automatic visual inspection offers an effective solution, especially in hard-to-reach areas. Machine learning approaches have proven their effectiveness but typically require large annotated datasets for supervised training. Once a crack is detected, monitoring its severity often demands precise segmentation of the damage. However, pixel-level annotation of images for segmentation is labor-intensive. To mitigate this cost, one can leverage explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to derive segmentations from the explanations of a classifier, requiring only weak image-level supervision. This paper proposes applying this methodology to segment and monitor surface cracks. We evaluate the performance of various XAI methods and examine how this approach facilitates severity quantification and growth monitoring. Results reveal that while the resulting segmentation masks may exhibit lower quality than those produced by supervised methods, they remain meaningful and enable severity monitoring, thus reducing substantial labeling costs.

Transformer-based conditional generative adversarial network for multivariate time series generation

Conditional generation of time-dependent data is a task that has much interest, whether for data augmentation, scenario simulation, completing missing data, or other purposes. Recent works proposed a Transformer-based Time series generative adversarial network (TTS-GAN) to address the limitations of recurrent neural networks. However, this model assumes a unimodal distribution and tries to generate samples around the expectation of the real data distribution. One of its limitations is that it may generate a random multivariate time series; it may fail to generate samples in the presence of multiple sub-components within an overall distribution. One could train models to fit each sub-component separately to overcome this limitation. Our work extends the TTS-GAN by conditioning its generated output on a particular encoded context allowing the use of one model to fit a mixture distribution with multiple sub-components. Technically, it is a conditional generative adversarial network that models realistic multivariate time series under different types of conditions, such as categorical variables or multivariate time series. We evaluate our model on UniMiB Dataset, which contains acceleration data following the XYZ axes of human activities collected using Smartphones. We use qualitative evaluations and quantitative metrics such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and we introduce a modified version of the Frechet inception distance (FID) to measure the performance of our model and the statistical similarities between the generated and the real data distributions. We show that this transformer-based CGAN can generate realistic high-dimensional and long data sequences under different kinds of conditions.

A Survey and Implementation of Performance Metrics for Self-Organized Maps

Self-Organizing Map algorithms have been used for almost 40 years across various application domains such as biology, geology, healthcare, industry and humanities as an interpretable tool to explore, cluster and visualize high-dimensional data sets. In every application, practitioners need to know whether they can \textit{trust} the resulting mapping, and perform model selection to tune algorithm parameters (e.g. the map size). Quantitative evaluation of self-organizing maps (SOM) is a subset of clustering validation, which is a challenging problem as such. Clustering model selection is typically achieved by using clustering validity indices. While they also apply to self-organized clustering models, they ignore the topology of the map, only answering the question: do the SOM code vectors approximate well the data distribution? Evaluating SOM models brings in the additional challenge of assessing their topology: does the mapping preserve neighborhood relationships between the map and the original data? The problem of assessing the performance of SOM models has already been tackled quite thoroughly in literature, giving birth to a family of quality indices incorporating neighborhood constraints, called \textit{topographic} indices. Commonly used examples of such metrics are the topographic error, neighborhood preservation or the topographic product. However, open-source implementations are almost impossible to find. This is the issue we try to solve in this work: after a survey of existing SOM performance metrics, we implemented them in Python and widely used numerical libraries, and provide them as an open-source library, SOMperf. This paper introduces each metric available in our module along with usage examples.

Selecting the Number of Clusters $K$ with a Stability Trade-off: an Internal Validation Criterion

Model selection is a major challenge in non-parametric clustering. There is no universally admitted way to evaluate clustering results for the obvious reason that there is no ground truth against which results could be tested, as in supervised learning. The difficulty to find a universal evaluation criterion is a direct consequence of the fundamentally ill-defined objective of clustering. In this perspective, clustering stability has emerged as a natural and model-agnostic principle: an algorithm should find stable structures in the data. If data sets are repeatedly sampled from the same underlying distribution, an algorithm should find similar partitions. However, it turns out that stability alone is not a well-suited tool to determine the number of clusters. For instance, it is unable to detect if the number of clusters is too small. We propose a new principle for clustering validation: a good clustering should be stable, and within each cluster, there should exist no stable partition. This principle leads to a novel internal clustering validity criterion based on between-cluster and within-cluster stability, overcoming limitations of previous stability-based methods. We empirically show the superior ability of additive noise to discover structures, compared with sampling-based perturbation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for selecting the number of clusters through a large number of experiments and compare it with existing evaluation methods.