When Is Shallow Enough? Adaptive Split Federated Learning with Client-Specific Sufficiency Estimation

\textit{Split Federated Learning} (SFL) enables distributed model training by splitting networks between the server and clients. However, under client heterogeneity, the conventional static split strategy may be suboptimal because clients can differ in data distributions, adaptation dynamics, and representation learning progress, making a single split point insufficient to accommodate client-specific training states. In this paper, we propose \textsc{FedSGA}, a \textbf{S}ufficiency-\textbf{G}uided \textbf{A}daptive split \textbf{Fed}erated learning framework that addresses this question through client-specific shallow sufficiency estimation. First, we introduce a client-specific adaptation channel based on private prompt tokens, which tracks local adaptation dynamics separately from the shared backbone and provides a lightweight signal for detecting whether client adaptation remains active. To further avoid repeated online probing over multiple candidate depths, we design a shallow sufficiency estimator that combines cross-client semantic alignment, temporal interface stability, and prompt-state variation to estimate whether the shallowest split is already sufficient. Finally, we introduce a split-compatible interface harmonization module that projects activations from different split depths into a shared semantic space, improving the comparability of heterogeneous client interfaces before server-side prediction. Extensive experiments on multiple heterogeneous benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of \textsc{FedSGA} in improving model performance compared with state-of-the-art methods while reducing unnecessary client-side computation.

Fisher-Routed Mixture of Experts for Federated Class-Incremental Learning

Federated Learning (FL) emerged as a promising distributed machine learning paradigm. However, extending FL to the class incremental learning scenarios introduces unique challenges: 1) Capacity conflict and catastrophic forgetting from the shared model overloading, 2) Heterogeneity from Non-Independent and Identically Distributed (Non-IID) data, and 3) Synchronized class misalignment. In this paper, we propose \textbf{F}isher-Routed \textbf{M}i\textbf{X}ture of Experts for \textbf{Fed}erated Class-Incremental Learning (\textsc{FedFMX}), a novel framework to address these challenges via adaptive expert specialization across clients. The crucial insight is to route each sample to an expert subset that jointly optimizes knowledge acquisition and retention. Specifically, we introduce a Fisher-Routed Expert Scoring (FRES) module to estimate expert importance via Fisher-based stability cost and gradient-based plasticity gain. Then, we design an Adaptive Expert Selection (AES) module by quantifying marginal contributions for adaptive expert subset determination. Finally, by the routing-aware regularization (RAR), we achieve load balance and efficient FL training. We theoretically prove the $\mathcal{O}(T^{-1})$ convergence rate. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks compared with state-of-the-art methods demonstrate the superiority of \textsc{FedFMX}.

Verify Before You Commit: Towards Faithful Reasoning in LLM Agents via Self-Auditing

In large language model (LLM) agents, reasoning trajectories are treated as reliable internal beliefs for guiding actions and updating memory. However, coherent reasoning can still violate logical or evidential constraints, allowing unsupported beliefs repeatedly stored and propagated across decision steps, leading to systematic behavioral drift in long-horizon agentic systems. Most existing strategies rely on the consensus mechanism, conflating agreement with faithfulness. In this paper, inspired by the vulnerability of unfaithful intermediate reasoning trajectories, we propose \textbf{S}elf-\textbf{A}udited \textbf{Ve}rified \textbf{R}easoning (\textsc{SAVeR}), a novel framework that enforces verification over internal belief states within the agent before action commitment, achieving faithful reasoning. Concretely, we structurally generate persona-based diverse candidate beliefs for selection under a faithfulness-relevant structure space. To achieve reasoning faithfulness, we perform adversarial auditing to localize violations and repair through constraint-guided minimal interventions under verifiable acceptance criteria. Extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently improves reasoning faithfulness while preserving competitive end-task performance.