If, Then, Otherwise: Diagnosing Conditional Branching in Vision-Language Navigation

Vision-language navigation agents are often evaluated on their ability to follow route-like instructions toward a fixed goal. Yet, real navigation instructions often depend on observed states of the environment: if a condition holds, then follow one path, otherwise take another. Such instructions require an agent to evaluate scene evidence, select the correct logical branch, and execute the corresponding navigation behavior. Existing evaluations provide limited control over conditional branch execution, making it difficult to determine whether agents fail because of perception, grounding, navigation, or logical decision-making. We introduce CondVLN, a scene-graph-grounded benchmark for diagnosing conditional branching in vision-language navigation. CondVLN programmatically generates instructions whose branch conditions are grounded in verifiable 3D scene-graph predicates, with controlled variation in branch depth, dependency chain length, spatial composition, evidence observability, and instruction horizon. CondVLN contains over 11,500 generated conditional instructions across AI2-THOR, Matterport3D, Gibson, and ReplicaCAD, and evaluates agents using standard VLN metrics and branch-specific diagnostics: Branch Selection Accuracy and Conditional Success Rate. Evaluating four state-of-the-art VLN agents (VLN-Zero, NaVid, NaVILA, and Open-Nav) shows that conditional branching exposes failures that are not captured by standard success rate or path length alone: agents can navigate plausibly while committing to a branch inconsistent with the observed scene condition. We also present a lightweight neurosymbolic branch-selection model that separates condition grounding from navigation execution, improving performance by 2x. CondVLN provides a reusable testbed for measuring whether embodied agents can not only follow instructions, but follow the right instruction under the right condition.

Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework

Multimodal foundation models offer a promising framework for robotic perception and planning by processing sensory inputs to generate actionable plans. However, addressing uncertainty in both perception (sensory interpretation) and decision-making (plan generation) remains a critical challenge for ensuring task reliability. We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate these two forms of uncertainty. We first introduce a framework for uncertainty disentanglement, isolating perception uncertainty arising from limitations in visual understanding and decision uncertainty relating to the robustness of generated plans. To quantify each type of uncertainty, we propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making: we use conformal prediction to calibrate perception uncertainty and introduce Formal-Methods-Driven Prediction (FMDP) to quantify decision uncertainty, leveraging formal verification techniques for theoretical guarantees. Building on this quantification, we implement two targeted intervention mechanisms: an active sensing process that dynamically re-observes high-uncertainty scenes to enhance visual input quality and an automated refinement procedure that fine-tunes the model on high-certainty data, improving its capability to meet task specifications. Empirical validation in real-world and simulated robotic tasks demonstrates that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines. These improvements are attributed to the combined effect of both interventions and highlight the importance of uncertainty disentanglement which facilitates targeted interventions that enhance the robustness and reliability of autonomous systems.