Migrant Resettlement by Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization

Migration has been a universal phenomenon, which brings opportunities as well as challenges for global development. As the number of migrants (e.g., refugees) increases rapidly in recent years, a key challenge faced by each country is the problem of migrant resettlement. This problem has attracted scientific research attention, from the perspective of maximizing the employment rate. Previous works mainly formulated migrant resettlement as an approximately submodular optimization problem subject to multiple matroid constraints and employed the greedy algorithm, whose performance, however, may be limited due to its greedy nature. In this paper, we propose a new framework MR-EMO based on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization, which reformulates Migrant Resettlement as a bi-objective optimization problem that maximizes the expected number of employed migrants and minimizes the number of dispatched migrants simultaneously, and employs a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA) to solve the bi-objective problem. We implement MR-EMO using three MOEAs, the popular NSGA-II, MOEA/D as well as the theoretically grounded GSEMO. To further improve the performance of MR-EMO, we propose a specific MOEA, called GSEMO-SR, using matrix-swap mutation and repair mechanism, which has a better ability to search for feasible solutions. We prove that MR-EMO using either GSEMO or GSEMO-SR can achieve better theoretical guarantees than the previous greedy algorithm. Experimental results under the interview and coordination migration models clearly show the superiority of MR-EMO (with either NSGA-II, MOEA/D, GSEMO or GSEMO-SR) over previous algorithms, and that using GSEMO-SR leads to the best performance of MR-EMO.

Result Diversification by Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Theoretical Guarantees

Given a ground set of items, the result diversification problem aims to select a subset with high "quality" and "diversity" while satisfying some constraints. It arises in various real-world artificial intelligence applications, such as web-based search, document summarization and feature selection, and also has applications in other areas, e.g., computational geometry, databases, finance and operations research. Previous algorithms are mainly based on greedy or local search. In this paper, we propose to reformulate the result diversification problem as a bi-objective maximization problem, and solve it by a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (EA), i.e., the GSEMO. We theoretically prove that the GSEMO can achieve the (asymptotically) optimal theoretical guarantees under both static and dynamic environments. For cardinality constraints, the GSEMO can achieve the optimal polynomial-time approximation ratio, $1/2$. For more general matroid constraints, the GSEMO can achieve the asymptotically optimal polynomial-time approximation ratio, $1/2-\epsilon/(4n)$. Furthermore, when the objective function (i.e., a linear combination of quality and diversity) changes dynamically, the GSEMO can maintain this approximation ratio in polynomial running time, addressing the open question proposed by Borodin et al. This also theoretically shows the superiority of EAs over local search for solving dynamic optimization problems for the first time, and discloses the robustness of the mutation operator of EAs against dynamic changes. Experiments on the applications of web-based search, multi-label feature selection and document summarization show the superior performance of the GSEMO over the state-of-the-art algorithms (i.e., the greedy algorithm and local search) under both static and dynamic environments.

Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms are Generally Good: Maximizing Monotone Submodular Functions over Sequences

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are general-purpose optimization algorithms, inspired by natural evolution. Recent theoretical studies have shown that EAs can achieve good approximation guarantees for solving the problem classes of submodular optimization, which have a wide range of applications, such as maximum coverage, sparse regression, influence maximization, document summarization and sensor placement, just to name a few. Though they have provided some theoretical explanation for the general-purpose nature of EAs, the considered submodular objective functions are defined only over sets or multisets. To complement this line of research, this paper studies the problem class of maximizing monotone submodular functions over sequences, where the objective function depends on the order of items. We prove that for each kind of previously studied monotone submodular objective functions over sequences, i.e., prefix monotone submodular functions, weakly monotone and strongly submodular functions, and DAG monotone submodular functions, a simple multi-objective EA, i.e., GSEMO, can always reach or improve the best known approximation guarantee after running polynomial time in expectation. Note that these best-known approximation guarantees can be obtained only by different greedy-style algorithms before. Empirical studies on various applications, e.g., accomplishing tasks, maximizing information gain, search-and-tracking and recommender systems, show the excellent performance of the GSEMO.