Abstract:While Large Language Models (LLMs) can convincingly simulate personas in explicit self-reports, they often deviate in implicit behavioral decisions, revealing a substantial Knowledge-Decision Gap ($G_{\text{KD}}$). Existing benchmarks struggle to measure this asymmetry due to limited construct validity, multi-dimensional entanglement, and distributional biases in LLM-based evaluation. To address these issues, we propose ActTraitBench, a human-grounded evaluation framework for measuring personality consistency in LLMs. Grounded in empirical human data, ActTraitBench establishes one-to-one mappings between psychometric facets and behavioral paradigms, and applies a Distributional Calibration via Quantile Mapping procedure to align LLM-judge score distributions with human norms. Experiments on 14 mainstream LLMs reveal a pervasive knowledge-decision asymmetry, where larger and more capable models often exhibit stronger behavioral divergence despite highly consistent self-reports. To mitigate this gap, we further introduce the Chain of Cognitive Alignment (CoCA), a plug-and-play inference-time intervention that improves alignment in reasoning-capable frontier models while exposing clear capability limitations in smaller architectures.
Abstract:Multi-trait essay scoring aims to provide fine-grained evaluation of writing quality across multiple dimensions. However, how to effectively post-train autoregressive scoring models remains underexplored. In this paper, we propose Trait-Aware Policy Optimization (TAPO), a post-training framework tailored to autoregressive multi-trait scoring. Our method decomposes rewards along both the sample and trait dimensions, combining global scoring consistency, trait-level accuracy, format validity, and inter-trait dependency preservation. In addition, we use enhanced prompts throughout training by incorporating original prompt texts and trait descriptions, providing richer semantic information for trait-specific score generation. Experiments across multiple backbone models show that our method consistently improves multi-trait scoring performance over supervised fine-tuning and scalar-reward optimization baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness and transferability of trait-aware post-training for essay scoring.
Abstract:Spatial reasoning has emerged as a critical capability for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), drawing increasing attention and rapid advancement. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on single-step perception-to-judgment tasks, leaving scenarios requiring complex visual-spatial logical chains significantly underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce Video-MSR, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate Multi-hop Spatial Reasoning (MSR) in dynamic video scenarios. Video-MSR systematically probes MSR capabilities through four distinct tasks: Constrained Localization, Chain-based Reference Retrieval, Route Planning, and Counterfactual Physical Deduction. Our benchmark comprises 3,052 high-quality video instances with 4,993 question-answer pairs, constructed via a scalable, visually-grounded pipeline combining advanced model generation with rigorous human verification. Through a comprehensive evaluation of 20 state-of-the-art MLLMs, we uncover significant limitations, revealing that while models demonstrate proficiency in surface-level perception, they exhibit distinct performance drops in MSR tasks, frequently suffering from spatial disorientation and hallucination during multi-step deductions. To mitigate these shortcomings and empower models with stronger MSR capabilities, we further curate MSR-9K, a specialized instruction-tuning dataset, and fine-tune Qwen-VL, achieving a +7.82% absolute improvement on Video-MSR. Our results underscore the efficacy of multi-hop spatial instruction data and establish Video-MSR as a vital foundation for future research. The code and data will be available at https://github.com/ruiz-nju/Video-MSR.