Previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) method achieved a remarkable execution accuracy on the Spider dataset, which is one of the largest and most diverse datasets in the Text-to-SQL domain. However, during our reproduce of the business dataset, we observed a significant drop in performance. We examined the differences in dataset complexity, as well as the clarity of questions' intentions, and assessed how those differences could impact the performance of prompting methods. Subsequently, We develop a more adaptable and more general prompting method, involving mainly query rewriting and SQL boosting, which respectively transform vague information into exact and precise information and enhance the SQL itself by incorporating execution feedback and the query results from the database content. In order to prevent information gaps, we include the comments, value types, and value samples for columns as part of the database description in the prompt. Our experiments with Large Language Models (LLMs) illustrate the significant performance improvement on the business dataset and prove the substantial potential of our method. In terms of execution accuracy on the business dataset, the SOTA method scored 21.05, while our approach scored 65.79. As a result, our approach achieved a notable performance improvement even when using a less capable pre-trained language model. Last but not the least, we also explore the Text-to-Python and Text-to-Function options, and we deeply analyze the pros and cons among them, offering valuable insights to the community.