Alert button

Revisiting Estimation Bias in Policy Gradients for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Jan 20, 2023
Haoxuan Pan, Deheng Ye, Xiaoming Duan, Qiang Fu, Wei Yang, Jianping He, Mingfei Sun

Figure 1 for Revisiting Estimation Bias in Policy Gradients for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Figure 2 for Revisiting Estimation Bias in Policy Gradients for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Figure 3 for Revisiting Estimation Bias in Policy Gradients for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Figure 4 for Revisiting Estimation Bias in Policy Gradients for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

We revisit the estimation bias in policy gradients for the discounted episodic Markov decision process (MDP) from Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) perspective. The objective is formulated theoretically as the expected returns discounted over the time horizon. One of the major policy gradient biases is the state distribution shift: the state distribution used to estimate the gradients differs from the theoretical formulation in that it does not take into account the discount factor. Existing discussion of the influence of this bias was limited to the tabular and softmax cases in the literature. Therefore, in this paper, we extend it to the DRL setting where the policy is parameterized and demonstrate how this bias can lead to suboptimal policies theoretically. We then discuss why the empirically inaccurate implementations with shifted state distribution can still be effective. We show that, despite such state distribution shift, the policy gradient estimation bias can be reduced in the following three ways: 1) a small learning rate; 2) an adaptive-learning-rate-based optimizer; and 3) KL regularization. Specifically, we show that a smaller learning rate, or, an adaptive learning rate, such as that used by Adam and RSMProp optimizers, makes the policy optimization robust to the bias. We further draw connections between optimizers and the optimization regularization to show that both the KL and the reverse KL regularization can significantly rectify this bias. Moreover, we provide extensive experiments on continuous control tasks to support our analysis. Our paper sheds light on how successful PG algorithms optimize policies in the DRL setting, and contributes insights into the practical issues in DRL.

* 12 pages, 9 figures  
View paper onarxiv icon

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: