Current NLP models are predominantly trained through a pretrain-then-finetune pipeline, where models are first pretrained on a large text corpus with a masked-language-modelling (MLM) objective, then finetuned on the downstream task. Prior work has shown that inserting an intermediate pre-training phase, with heuristic MLM objectives that resemble downstream tasks, can significantly improve final performance. However, it is still unclear (1) in what cases such intermediate pre-training is helpful, (2) whether hand-crafted heuristic objectives are optimal for a given task, and (3) whether a MLM policy designed for one task is generalizable beyond that task. In this paper, we perform a large-scale empirical study to investigate the effect of various MLM policies in intermediate pre-training. Crucially, we introduce methods to automate discovery of optimal MLM policies, by learning a masking model through either direct supervision or meta-learning on the downstream task. We investigate the effects of using heuristic, directly supervised, and meta-learned MLM policies for intermediate pretraining, on eight selected tasks across three categories (closed-book QA, knowledge-intensive language tasks, and abstractive summarization). Most notably, we show that learned masking policies outperform the heuristic of masking named entities on TriviaQA, and masking policies learned on one task can positively transfer to other tasks in certain cases.