Alert button

Multimodal Fusion of EMG and Vision for Human Grasp Intent Inference in Prosthetic Hand Control

Apr 08, 2021
Mehrshad Zandigohar, Mo Han, Mohammadreza Sharif, Sezen Yagmur Gunay, Mariusz P. Furmanek, Mathew Yarossi, Paolo Bonato, Cagdas Onal, Taskin Padir, Deniz Erdogmus, Gunar Schirner

Figure 1 for Multimodal Fusion of EMG and Vision for Human Grasp Intent Inference in Prosthetic Hand Control
Figure 2 for Multimodal Fusion of EMG and Vision for Human Grasp Intent Inference in Prosthetic Hand Control
Figure 3 for Multimodal Fusion of EMG and Vision for Human Grasp Intent Inference in Prosthetic Hand Control
Figure 4 for Multimodal Fusion of EMG and Vision for Human Grasp Intent Inference in Prosthetic Hand Control

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

For lower arm amputees, robotic prosthetic hands offer the promise to regain the capability to perform fine object manipulation in activities of daily living. Current control methods based on physiological signals such as EEG and EMG are prone to poor inference outcomes due to motion artifacts, variability of skin electrode junction impedance over time, muscle fatigue, and other factors. Visual evidence is also susceptible to its own artifacts, most often due to object occlusion, lighting changes, variable shapes of objects depending on view-angle, among other factors. Multimodal evidence fusion using physiological and vision sensor measurements is a natural approach due to the complementary strengths of these modalities. In this paper, we present a Bayesian evidence fusion framework for grasp intent inference using eye-view video, gaze, and EMG from the forearm processed by neural network models. We analyze individual and fused performance as a function of time as the hand approaches the object to grasp it. For this purpose, we have also developed novel data processing and augmentation techniques to train neural network components. Our experimental data analyses demonstrate that EMG and visual evidence show complementary strengths, and as a consequence, fusion of multimodal evidence can outperform each individual evidence modality at any given time. Specifically, results indicate that, on average, fusion improves the instantaneous upcoming grasp type classification accuracy while in the reaching phase by 13.66% and 14.8%, relative to EMG and visual evidence individually. An overall fusion accuracy of 95.3% among 13 labels (compared to a chance level of 7.7%) is achieved, and more detailed analysis indicate that the correct grasp is inferred sufficiently early and with high confidence compared to the top contender, in order to allow successful robot actuation to close the loop.

* This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible  
View paper onarxiv icon

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: