Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

Chrome logo Add to Chrome

Firefox logo Add to Firefox


Fully Onboard AI-powered Human-Drone Pose Estimation on Ultra-low Power Autonomous Flying Nano-UAVs

Mar 19, 2021
Daniele Palossi, Nicky Zimmerman, Alessio Burrello, Francesco Conti, Hanna M眉ller, Luca Maria Gambardella, Luca Benini, Alessandro Giusti, J茅r么me Guzzi



Artificial intelligence-powered pocket-sized air robots have the potential to revolutionize the Internet-of-Things ecosystem, acting as autonomous, unobtrusive, and ubiquitous smart sensors. With a few cm$^{2}$ form-factor, nano-sized unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are the natural befit for indoor human-drone interaction missions, as the pose estimation task we address in this work. However, this scenario is challenged by the nano-UAVs' limited payload and computational power that severely relegates the onboard brain to the sub-100 mW microcontroller unit-class. Our work stands at the intersection of the novel parallel ultra-low-power (PULP) architectural paradigm and our general development methodology for deep neural network (DNN) visual pipelines, i.e., covering from perception to control. Addressing the DNN model design, from training and dataset augmentation to 8-bit quantization and deployment, we demonstrate how a PULP-based processor, aboard a nano-UAV, is sufficient for the real-time execution (up to 135 frame/s) of our novel DNN, called PULP-Frontnet. We showcase how, scaling our model's memory and computational requirement, we can significantly improve the onboard inference (top energy efficiency of 0.43 mJ/frame) with no compromise in the quality-of-result vs. a resource-unconstrained baseline (i.e., full-precision DNN). Field experiments demonstrate a closed-loop top-notch autonomous navigation capability, with a heavily resource-constrained 27-gram Crazyflie 2.1 nano-quadrotor. Compared against the control performance achieved using an ideal sensing setup, onboard relative pose inference yields excellent drone behavior in terms of median absolute errors, such as positional (onboard: 41 cm, ideal: 26 cm) and angular (onboard: 3.7$^{\circ}$, ideal: 4.1$^{\circ}$).

* 15 pages, 15 figures, 4 tables. This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible 


Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

   Access Paper Source



Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: