Alert button

More Embeddings, Better Sequence Labelers?

Sep 17, 2020
Xinyu Wang, Yong Jiang, Nguyen Bach, Tao Wang, Zhongqiang Huang, Fei Huang, Kewei Tu

Figure 1 for More Embeddings, Better Sequence Labelers?
Figure 2 for More Embeddings, Better Sequence Labelers?
Figure 3 for More Embeddings, Better Sequence Labelers?
Figure 4 for More Embeddings, Better Sequence Labelers?

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

Recent work proposes a family of contextual embeddings that significantly improves the accuracy of sequence labelers over non-contextual embeddings. However, there is no definite conclusion on whether we can build better sequence labelers by combining different kinds of embeddings in various settings. In this paper, we conduct extensive experiments on 3 tasks over 18 datasets and 8 languages to study the accuracy of sequence labeling with various embedding concatenations and make three observations: (1) concatenating more embedding variants leads to better accuracy in rich-resource and cross-domain settings and some conditions of low-resource settings; (2) concatenating additional contextual sub-word embeddings with contextual character embeddings hurts the accuracy in extremely low-resource settings; (3) based on the conclusion of (1), concatenating additional similar contextual embeddings cannot lead to further improvements. We hope these conclusions can help people build stronger sequence labelers in various settings.

* Accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2020. 16 pages  
View paper onarxiv icon

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it: