HiSync: Spatio-Temporally Aligning Hand Motion from Wearable IMU and On-Robot Camera for Command Source Identification in Long-Range HRI

Long-range Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) remains underexplored. Within it, Command Source Identification (CSI) - determining who issued a command - is especially challenging due to multi-user and distance-induced sensor ambiguity. We introduce HiSync, an optical-inertial fusion framework that treats hand motion as binding cues by aligning robot-mounted camera optical flow with hand-worn IMU signals. We first elicit a user-defined (N=12) gesture set and collect a multimodal command gesture dataset (N=38) in long-range multi-user HRI scenarios. Next, HiSync extracts frequency-domain hand motion features from both camera and IMU data, and a learned CSINet denoises IMU readings, temporally aligns modalities, and performs distance-aware multi-window fusion to compute cross-modal similarity of subtle, natural gestures, enabling robust CSI. In three-person scenes up to 34m, HiSync achieves 92.32% CSI accuracy, outperforming the prior SOTA by 48.44%. HiSync is also validated on real-robot deployment. By making CSI reliable and natural, HiSync provides a practical primitive and design guidance for public-space HRI.

MOAT: Evaluating LMMs for Capability Integration and Instruction Grounding

Large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated significant potential as generalists in vision-language (VL) tasks. However, there remains a significant gap between state-of-the-art LMMs and human performance when it comes to complex tasks that require a combination of fundamental VL capabilities, as well as tasks involving the grounding of complex instructions. To thoroughly investigate the human-LMM gap and its underlying causes, we propose MOAT, a diverse benchmark with complex real-world VL tasks that are challenging for LMMs. Specifically, the tasks in MOAT require LMMs to engage in generalist problem solving by integrating fundamental VL capabilities such as reading text, counting, understanding spatial relations, grounding textual and visual instructions, etc. All these abilities fit into a taxonomy proposed by us that contains 10 fundamental VL capabilities, enabling MOAT to provide a fine-grained view of LMMs' strengths and weaknesses. Besides, MOAT is the first benchmark to explicitly evaluate LMMs' ability to ground complex text and visual instructions, which is essential to many real-world applications. We evaluate over 20 proprietary and open source LMMs, as well as humans, on MOAT, and found that humans achieved 82.7% accuracy while the best performing LMM (OpenAI o1) achieved only 38.8%. To guide future model development, we analyze common trends in our results and discuss the underlying causes of observed performance gaps between LMMs and humans, focusing on which VL capability forms the bottleneck in complex tasks, whether test time scaling improves performance on MOAT, and how tiling harms LMMs' capability to count. Code and data are available at https://cambrian-yzt.github.io/MOAT.