Long-CODE: Isolating Pure Long-Context as an Orthogonal Dimension in Video Evaluation

As video generation models achieve unprecedented capabilities, the demand for robust video evaluation metrics becomes increasingly critical. Traditional metrics are intrinsically tailored for short-video evaluation, predominantly assessing frame-level visual quality and localized temporal smoothness. However, as state-of-the-art video generation models scale to generate longer videos, these metrics fail to capture essential long-range characteristics, such as narrative richness and global causal consistency. Recognizing that short-term visual perception and long-context attributes are fundamentally orthogonal dimensions, we argue that long-video metrics should be disentangled from short-video assessments. In this paper, we focus on the rigorous justification and design of a dedicated framework for long-video evaluation. We first introduce a suite of long-video attribute corruption tests, exposing the critical limitations of existing hort-video metrics from their insensitivity to structural inconsistencies, such as shot-level perturbations and narrative shuffling. To bridge this gap, we design a novel long-video metric based on shot dynamics, which is highly sensitive to the long-range testing framework. Furthermore, we introduce Long-CODE (Long-Context as an Orthogonal Dimension for video Evaluation), a specialized dataset designed to benchmark long-video evaluation, with human annotations isolated specifically to genuine long-range characteristics. Extensive experiments show that our proposed metrics achieve state-of-the-art correlation with human judgments. Ultimately, our metric and benchmark seamlessly complement existing short-video standards, establishing a holistic and unbiased evaluation paradigm for video generation models.

CCCaption: Dual-Reward Reinforcement Learning for Complete and Correct Image Captioning

Image captioning remains a fundamental task for vision language understanding, yet ground-truth supervision still relies predominantly on human-annotated references. Because human annotations reflect subjective preferences and expertise, ground-truth captions are often incomplete or even incorrect, which in turn limits caption models. We argue that caption quality should be assessed by two objective aspects: completeness (does the caption cover all salient visual facts?) and correctness (are the descriptions true with respect to the image?). To this end, we introduce CCCaption: a dual-reward reinforcement learning framework with a dedicated fine-tuning corpus that explicitly optimizes these properties to generate \textbf{C}omplete and \textbf{C}orrect \textbf{Captions}. For completeness, we use diverse LVLMs to disentangle the image into a set of visual queries, and reward captions that answer more of these queries, with a dynamic query sampling strategy to improve training efficiency. For correctness, we penalize captions that contain hallucinations by validating the authenticity of sub-caption queries, which are derived from the caption decomposition. Our symmetric dual-reward optimization jointly maximizes completeness and correctness, guiding models toward captions that better satisfy these objective criteria. Extensive experiments across standard captioning benchmarks show consistent improvements, offering a principled path to training caption models beyond human-annotation imitation.