Bridging the Gap between Newton-Raphson Method and Regularized Policy Iteration

Regularization is one of the most important techniques in reinforcement learning algorithms. The well-known soft actor-critic algorithm is a special case of regularized policy iteration where the regularizer is chosen as Shannon entropy. Despite some empirical success of regularized policy iteration, its theoretical underpinnings remain unclear. This paper proves that regularized policy iteration is strictly equivalent to the standard Newton-Raphson method in the condition of smoothing out Bellman equation with strongly convex functions. This equivalence lays the foundation of a unified analysis for both global and local convergence behaviors of regularized policy iteration. We prove that regularized policy iteration has global linear convergence with the rate being $\gamma$ (discount factor). Furthermore, this algorithm converges quadratically once it enters a local region around the optimal value. We also show that a modified version of regularized policy iteration, i.e., with finite-step policy evaluation, is equivalent to inexact Newton method where the Newton iteration formula is solved with truncated iterations. We prove that the associated algorithm achieves an asymptotic linear convergence rate of $\gamma^M$ in which $M$ denotes the number of steps carried out in policy evaluation. Our results take a solid step towards a better understanding of the convergence properties of regularized policy iteration algorithms.

Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning under Adversarial Disturbances

Safety is a primary concern when applying reinforcement learning to real-world control tasks, especially in the presence of external disturbances. However, existing safe reinforcement learning algorithms rarely account for external disturbances, limiting their applicability and robustness in practice. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a robust safe reinforcement learning framework that tackles worst-case disturbances. First, this paper presents a policy iteration scheme to solve for the robust invariant set, i.e., a subset of the safe set, where persistent safety is only possible for states within. The key idea is to establish a two-player zero-sum game by leveraging the safety value function in Hamilton-Jacobi reachability analysis, in which the protagonist (i.e., control inputs) aims to maintain safety and the adversary (i.e., external disturbances) tries to break down safety. This paper proves that the proposed policy iteration algorithm converges monotonically to the maximal robust invariant set. Second, this paper integrates the proposed policy iteration scheme into a constrained reinforcement learning algorithm that simultaneously synthesizes the robust invariant set and uses it for constrained policy optimization. This algorithm tackles both optimality and safety, i.e., learning a policy that attains high rewards while maintaining safety under worst-case disturbances. Experiments on classic control tasks show that the proposed method achieves zero constraint violation with learned worst-case adversarial disturbances, while other baseline algorithms violate the safety constraints substantially. Our proposed method also attains comparable performance as the baselines even in the absence of the adversary.

Safe Reinforcement Learning with Dual Robustness

Reinforcement learning (RL) agents are vulnerable to adversarial disturbances, which can deteriorate task performance or compromise safety specifications. Existing methods either address safety requirements under the assumption of no adversary (e.g., safe RL) or only focus on robustness against performance adversaries (e.g., robust RL). Learning one policy that is both safe and robust remains a challenging open problem. The difficulty is how to tackle two intertwined aspects in the worst cases: feasibility and optimality. Optimality is only valid inside a feasible region, while identification of maximal feasible region must rely on learning the optimal policy. To address this issue, we propose a systematic framework to unify safe RL and robust RL, including problem formulation, iteration scheme, convergence analysis and practical algorithm design. This unification is built upon constrained two-player zero-sum Markov games. A dual policy iteration scheme is proposed, which simultaneously optimizes a task policy and a safety policy. The convergence of this iteration scheme is proved. Furthermore, we design a deep RL algorithm for practical implementation, called dually robust actor-critic (DRAC). The evaluations with safety-critical benchmarks demonstrate that DRAC achieves high performance and persistent safety under all scenarios (no adversary, safety adversary, performance adversary), outperforming all baselines significantly.