Understanding the Challenges in Iterative Generative Optimization with LLMs

Generative optimization uses large language models (LLMs) to iteratively improve artifacts (such as code, workflows or prompts) using execution feedback. It is a promising approach to building self-improving agents, yet in practice remains brittle: despite active research, only 9% of surveyed agents used any automated optimization. We argue that this brittleness arises because, to set up a learning loop, an engineer must make ``hidden'' design choices: What can the optimizer edit and what is the "right" learning evidence to provide at each update? We investigate three factors that affect most applications: the starting artifact, the credit horizon for execution traces, and batching trials and errors into learning evidence. Through case studies in MLAgentBench, Atari, and BigBench Extra Hard, we find that these design decisions can determine whether generative optimization succeeds, yet they are rarely made explicit in prior work. Different starting artifacts determine which solutions are reachable in MLAgentBench, truncated traces can still improve Atari agents, and larger minibatches do not monotonically improve generalization on BBEH. We conclude that the lack of a simple, universal way to set up learning loops across domains is a major hurdle for productionization and adoption. We provide practical guidance for making these choices.

Learning Game-Playing Agents with Generative Code Optimization

We present a generative optimization approach for learning game-playing agents, where policies are represented as Python programs and refined using large language models (LLMs). Our method treats decision-making policies as self-evolving code, with current observation as input and an in-game action as output, enabling agents to self-improve through execution traces and natural language feedback with minimal human intervention. Applied to Atari games, our game-playing Python program achieves performance competitive with deep reinforcement learning (RL) baselines while using significantly less training time and much fewer environment interactions. This work highlights the promise of programmatic policy representations for building efficient, adaptable agents capable of complex, long-horizon reasoning.